How can we help?


Pre-winding up settlement with director set aside

For a short time, Officeserve Technologies Limited (OTL) made a big impact in the ‘lunch at work’ market.  Its director and majority shareholder,  CAM, oversaw a rapid expansion to an estimated value of £40 million.  However, OTL was unable to pay the instalments due on two businesses it had acquired and in October 2016 was served with a winding-up petition. 

CAM was removed as a director and in December 2016 he entered into a settlement agreement with OTL, which included CAM giving up his shares in the company.  It was hoped that this would allow OTL to reach a settlement with its creditors.  That wasn’t possible and OTL was wound up in February 2017.

Notwithstanding the settlement agreement, OTL’s liquidators sought declarations against CAM that he had misapplied company money and that payments to him were void under section 127 Insolvency Act 1986.  They sought an order that he repay to OTL more than £500k.

Section 127 provides that dispositions of company property between presentation of a winding-up petition and a winding-up order are void.  The Court had to consider (1) whether the settlement agreement precluded such a claim being brought and (2) whether the giving up of a cause of action is a disposition of property within the meaning of s127.

CAM lost on both counts.   The Court noted that in the settlement agreement CAM gave up all claims as an employee and director.  In contrast, OTL only gave up claims against CAM as an employee.  Accordingly, the liquidators remained free to bring claims against him in his capacity as director.


They sought an order that he repay to OTL more than £500k.

The Court went on to find that the settlement would have been void under s127 in any event.  Although the settlement was not obviously a transfer of property, the intention behind s127 is to prevent the reduction in the value of the company’s assets as a whole, including causes of action.

The Court was invited by CAM to validate the settlement agreement under s127.  It declined to do so.  The Court was entitled to judge this issue with the benefit of hindsight.  Had the settlement allowed the company to be saved, it may well have been in OTL’s interests.  However, as this wasn’t possible, it became a bad deal from OTL’s creditors’ perspective and should be set aside.

This case is significant because it is the first reported decision of whether the settling of claims against a director in the context of an employment settlement agreement is a disposition of property and void in the context of winding-up.  Accordingly, it is a helpful reminder of the width of s127 and the care a company should take before entering into any transaction once a winding up petition has been served.

About this article

This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

  • 22 September 2023
  • Employment

Talking Employment Law: New family friendly rights

In this first podcast in the ‘Talking Employment Law’ series, Lucy Densham Brown and Rebecca Dowle, members of the employment team summarise some of the big new family-friendly Bills that are working their way through parliament.

  • 20 September 2023
  • Commercial Real Estate

Commercial buyers beware of residential Stamp Duty Land Tax

This article discusses a recent case in which a property buyer calculated the Stamp Duty Land Tax due on the purchase at a lower rate, due to the mixed-use purpose of the property.

  • 19 September 2023
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Organisations’ use of social media: Data protection

Social media applications (or commonly known as ‘apps’) are being developed all the time and we are constantly being introduced to new social media platforms, some of which take almost no time to gain huge popularity.

  • 14 September 2023
  • Immigration

Entrepreneurial Dreams: What is the Innovator Founder Visa?

In an era defined by innovation and entrepreneurship, the United Kingdom has made a substantial effort towards fostering its reputation as a global hub for start-ups and innovators. The introduction of the UK’s ‘Innovator Founder’ route has marked a pivotal moment in the country’s immigration policy.

  • 11 September 2023
  • Corporate and M&A

Changes to the tax treatment of Employee Ownership Trusts

The government published a consultation on 18 July 2023 seeking the public’s views on its proposals to reform the tax treatment of Employee Ownership Trusts and Employee Benefit Trusts. Parties are invited to express their opinions via email via the government website until the consultation closes on 25 September 2023.

  • 08 September 2023
  • Immigration

Navigating the Latest Immigration Rules for Overstayers in the UK: A Comprehensive Guide for 2023

Staying beyond the expiration of your UK visa is a serious matter that, in most cases, can result in significant and long-lasting repercussions.