Search

How can we help?

Icon

Payments to ex-employee during restrictive covenant period made no difference to enforceability

The recent case of Bartholomews Agri Food v Thornton has provided some useful guidance to employers who wish to rely on restrictive covenants when an employee leaves. Restrictive covenants (for example that prevent an employee from dealing with the employer’s clients, poaching clients or staff of the employer or working for a competitor) can be difficult to enforce, as highlighted in this case.

Mr Thornton had worked for his employer, an agricultural merchant, since he started as a trainee in 1997. His employment contract contained a restrictive covenant that prevented him from engaging in “work, supplying goods or services of a similar nature which compete with the company to the company’s customers, with a trade competitor within the company’s trading area… or on [his] own account without prior approval from the company” for six months after the termination of his employment. Unusually, it also provided that the company would pay him in full during those six months.

Mr Thornton resigned to work for a competitor and the company tried to enforce the restrictive covenant by seeking an interim injunction at the High Court.

To enforce the restriction the company had to show that it had legitimate business interests which required protection and that the restrictive covenant was no wider than was reasonably necessary to protect these interests. The High Court held that the restriction was not enforceable for the following reasons:

  • Restrictive covenants are assessed at the time they are entered into.  At the time the contract was entered into (18 years previously) the employee had been a trainee with no customer contacts, so the restriction was not protecting a legitimate interest. The employee was later promoted to a role where the restriction could have been justified, however, he did not re-enter the restrictive covenant at this point and so it could not be assessed from this stage.

The High Court held that the restriction was not enforceable.

  • The restriction was far wider than was reasonably necessary as it applied to all customers of the company and its associated companies, regardless of whether the employee had had any relationship with them. The employee was only responsible for just over 1% of the company’s turnover and did not deal with 98% of the customers.
  • It made no difference that the company was prepared to continue paying the employee during the period of restriction –  permitting an employer to effectively purchase a restraint of trade is contrary to public policy.

This case reinforces the importance of giving careful thought to the drafting of restrictive covenants and makes clear that making payments during the period covered by the restrictive covenant will not impact enforceability.  In this case, had the employer issued a new contract to the employee on promotion with a restriction that only prevented him from dealing with customers that he had prior dealings with then it may well have been enforceable.

Disclaimer

This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

Monica Atwal

Managing Partner

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 19 August 2025
  • Immigration

Navigating New UK Immigration Rules: The 2025 Changes

In our latest podcast, join Ruth Karimatsenga and Monica Mastropasqua from the immigration team as they guide you through the new 2025 UK Immigration Rules.

art
  • 18 August 2025
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Top 10 DUAA Compliance Tips for Employers

To support your preparation, we have outlined 10 practical tips to help employers navigate the new requirements and take full advantage of the DUAA’s reforms.

art
  • 15 August 2025
  • Employment

Employment Rights Bill – Get your tailored action plan now!

The Employment Rights Bill is a major piece of legislation which significantly overhauls worker’s rights.

art
  • 13 August 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

Proposed Ban of upwards only rent reviews

In an effort to save the high street, the government has proposed to ban upwards only rent reviews in commercial leases, without any consultation with professional bodies. It has caught the commercial property sector completely by surprise.

art
  • 12 August 2025
  • Privacy and Data Protection

From WeTransfer to WhatsApp: How Unapproved Tools and “Shadow IT” Could Threaten UK GDPR Compliance

Businesses and self-employed professionals are in a constant pursuit of efficiency and productivity.  There are, as a result, no end of tools and products available to smooth digital workflows. 

art
  • 07 August 2025
  • Immigration

New simplified British Citizenship route for Irish Citizens now in force

From 22 July 2025, eligible Irish citizens who have been resident in the UK for five years can now register as British citizens under a new, simplified route.