Search

How can we help?

Icon

New ruling provides health and safety detriment

Protection from health and safety detriments and the right to PPE should cover ‘workers’ as well as employees, High Court rules.

Until coronavirus arrived in the UK places like offices, shops, care homes,  hospitality venues and other peoples’ own homes were rarely considered to be potentially dangerous places to work.  That’s why so few businesses had any awareness or experience of their employees’ rights under S44 and S100 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. In brief, S44 and S100 protect employees from being subjected to a detriment, or being dismissed if they leave work, refuse to attend work, or take some action, because they reasonably believe there is a threat of ‘serious and imminent danger’.  It often comes as a surprise to employers that it is the employee’s belief that counts, depending on the  information available to them at the time, and not the employer’s opinion.

Protection from health and safety detriments and the right to PPE should cover ‘workers’ as well as employees, High Court rules.

The right not to subjected to H&S detriments, and the right to be provided with PPE where an activity at work cannot be avoided, derive from European Directives (The Framework Directive and The Personal Protective Equipment Directive).  However, in UK law these rights only apply to employees, not workers. In its application for a judicial review, the Independent Workers Union of Great Britain (IWUGB) argued that the government had failed to implement these European H&S Directives and that workers should be given the same protection as employees. Last week the High Court agreed with the IWUGB [The Independent Workers’ Union of Great Britain v The Secretary of State for Work & Pensions and others]

With so many workers in the gig economy operating in public facing roles, from care workers to taxi and deliver drivers, this case significantly expands the number of people afforded H&S protection, and the right to bring claims against their employers. If businesses had an urgent need to understand these key H&S rights when COVID 19 first afflicted the UK last Spring, that need is even greater now.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 17 February 2026
  • Employment

The Employment Rights Act – A shift in power: why employers will face greater pressure from industrial action and union relations in 2026

Substantial union-related changes under the Employment Rights Act 2025 will take effect on 18 February 2026, ushering in significant shifts in the legal landscape for industrial action in the UK.

art
  • 16 February 2026
  • Immigration

High Potential Individual Visa (HPI Visa) – UK Immigration Route

The High Potential Individual (HPI) visa is a UK immigration route designed to attract recent graduates from top-ranked international universities.

art
  • 13 February 2026
  • Employment

Businesses Prepare for Stronger Trade Union Rights: Monica Atwal Comments

The new trade union rights introduced by the Employment Rights Act 2025 will come into force on 18 February 2026. These changes are expected to make strikes easier to organise and will extend protections for striking workers. Monica Atwal comments on the implications of these reforms in People Management magazine.

art
  • 12 February 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Love is in the air: Is it data at first sight?

As we enter the week of Valentine’s Day, it is important to recognise the significance of data security, particularly where we have seen the number of cybersecurity breaches increase over the last few months.

art
  • 10 February 2026
  • Commercial Real Estate

Can a tenant terminate their lease if the premises are no longer needed?

Ending of the lease is most likely not high on the priority list when a tenant is taking up a new lease.

art
  • 05 February 2026
  • Immigration

Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR) – Debating the future of Settlement

On 2 February 2026, a Westminster Hall debate brought an unusually focused spotlight onto a part of the immigration system that is often discussed in technical terms but rarely examined in such public and political detail: Indefinite Leave to Remain.