Search

How can we help?

Icon

New ruling provides health and safety detriment

Protection from health and safety detriments and the right to PPE should cover ‘workers’ as well as employees, High Court rules.

Until coronavirus arrived in the UK places like offices, shops, care homes,  hospitality venues and other peoples’ own homes were rarely considered to be potentially dangerous places to work.  That’s why so few businesses had any awareness or experience of their employees’ rights under S44 and S100 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. In brief, S44 and S100 protect employees from being subjected to a detriment, or being dismissed if they leave work, refuse to attend work, or take some action, because they reasonably believe there is a threat of ‘serious and imminent danger’.  It often comes as a surprise to employers that it is the employee’s belief that counts, depending on the  information available to them at the time, and not the employer’s opinion.

Protection from health and safety detriments and the right to PPE should cover ‘workers’ as well as employees, High Court rules.

The right not to subjected to H&S detriments, and the right to be provided with PPE where an activity at work cannot be avoided, derive from European Directives (The Framework Directive and The Personal Protective Equipment Directive).  However, in UK law these rights only apply to employees, not workers. In its application for a judicial review, the Independent Workers Union of Great Britain (IWUGB) argued that the government had failed to implement these European H&S Directives and that workers should be given the same protection as employees. Last week the High Court agreed with the IWUGB [The Independent Workers’ Union of Great Britain v The Secretary of State for Work & Pensions and others]

With so many workers in the gig economy operating in public facing roles, from care workers to taxi and deliver drivers, this case significantly expands the number of people afforded H&S protection, and the right to bring claims against their employers. If businesses had an urgent need to understand these key H&S rights when COVID 19 first afflicted the UK last Spring, that need is even greater now.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 28 August 2026
  • Immigration

Right to Work and Sponsor Licence Changes 2026: Key dates for businesses

In this podcast, immigration solicitors Ruth Karimatsenga and Monica Mastropasqua discuss the key immigration compliance changes coming into force in September and October 2026 and what employers, HR teams, sponsors and individuals should do to prepare.

art
  • 28 August 2026
  • Commercial Real Estate

Modernising security of tenure: The Law Commission’s follow up consultation paper

On 16th June 2026, the Commission published its second consultation paper: Business Tenancies: the right to renew – modernising security of tenure.

Pub
  • 27 August 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

The Highly Expedited Arbitration Provisions – ICC Rules 2026 – Factsheet

This factsheet provides an overview of the ICC’s Highly Expedited Arbitration Provisions (HEAP), outlining some of the key procedural features introduced by Appendix VI of the 2026 Rules and the potential benefits of this new expedited process.

art
  • 27 August 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

EMIs – April 2026 changes explained

On 6 April 2026 the Enterprise Management Incentive scheme (EMI) was expanded to make EMIs accessible to a wider range of businesses.

art
  • 19 August 2026
  • Employment

Managing employee redundancies: Frequently asked questions (FAQs)

Redundancy should be an employer’s last option when restructuring their business. There are necessary steps that should be taken to ensure that redundancy is the best move forward

art
  • 18 August 2026
  • Immigration

Home Office curtailment of Sponsored Workers’ permission: Why employers and employees must act quickly

The Home Office has recently changed the speed at which it processes sponsor notifications following the end of a sponsored worker’s employment.