Search

How can we help?

Icon

Max award for employees told of redundancies via social media

Twenty-three employees have won the maximum ‘Protective Award’ of 90 days extra pay because their employer failed to ‘inform and consult’ with them about their redundancies. Under S188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (TULCRA), employers must follow collective consultation rules where it proposes to make over 20 redundancies in a 90 day period.

Consultations must start 30 days before the proposed dismissal of between 20 and 99 employees or 45 days for 100+ employees

(And it’s important to note that even if fewer than 20, or fewer than 100, employees are subsequently made redundant, the original start date for the consultations still applies. That is because the collective consultation rules are based on the number of dismissals being proposed at the beginning of the process).

In this case of Whalley & Others v The Bliss Space (Southport) Ltd (In Voluntary Liquidation) the employees were furloughed in March 2020 from their jobs at a theatre and conference centre. They discovered through their employer’s social media page that from May 2020 they would not be returning to work as their employer had gone into liquidation. It had been clear in the social media post that the company had been in discussion with the local authority about the impending closure, but neither the employees nor their union had been contacted before the decision was made.

The employment tribunal awarded each individual the maximum protective award of 90 days’ gross pay because Bliss Space was unable to demonstrate a ‘special circumstances’ defence which meant it was not reasonably practicable to consult in good time.

Employers still need to comply with their obligations under S188 TULCRA.

This case serves as a warning that if a business needs to make redundancies caused by the coronavirus pandemic related lockdowns that, on its own, is not enough to provide a special circumstances defence.

If you have any questions about how to manage a collective redundancy process, or the special circumstances defence, our employment team is on hand to help.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 15 September 2025
  • Immigration

Sharp rise in Sponsor Licence Revocations – What employers need to know

The Home Office has reported a record number of sponsor licence revocations over the past year, as part of its intensified efforts to crack down on abuse of the UK’s immigration system.

art
  • 10 September 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

Trouble at the Table: The Challenges Facing the UK Hospitality Sector in the run up to Christmas 2025

The UK hospitality sector, long celebrated for its vibrancy and resilience, is facing a perfect storm of economic, operational, and structural challenges in 2025.

art
  • 09 September 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

Le bail commercial anglais: quelques points essentiels à considérer

Typiquement, les baux commerciaux en Angleterre sont de court terme, d’une durée de 5 ou 10 ans, avec un loyer de marché et des ajustements du loyer périodiques en fonction de l’inflation ou d’autres facteurs. 

art
  • 09 September 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

The Failure to Prevent Fraud Offence – be prepared to avoid criminal liability

The failure to prevent fraud offence is a new corporate offence which has come into force on 1 September 2025.

art
  • 08 September 2025
  • Employment

Can employers still make changes to contracts after the Employment Rights Bill?

The short answer is yes but it will be much more difficult for employers following the introduction of the Employment Rights Bill because their ability to fairly dismiss employees who do not agree contractual changes is being restricted. 

art
  • 05 September 2025
  • Privacy and Data Protection

When Ignoring a DSAR Becomes a Criminal Offence

On 3 September 2025, Mr Jason Blake appeared at Beverley Magistrates Court and was fined for failing to respond to a data subject access request (DSAR).