Search

How can we help?

Icon

Manchester’s Good Employment Charter

Last week, over 60 businesses in the Greater Manchester Combined Authority volunteered to refrain from using zero-hours contracts by signing up to the Good Employment Charter.

The Charter was created by the mayor of Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham. It aims to promote better working conditions, consultation with workers, and flexible working as well as more training and routes for progression. In addition to clarifying employees’ income and working hours, signatories are expected to pay their employees the UK living wage, which is higher than the statutory national living wage (the UK living wage is currently £9.00 an hour and the London Living Wage is £10.55 an hour). In addition, employers are expected to avoid using “unnecessary forms of insecure employment” such as temporary, zero hour or agency contracts.

The Good Employment Charter also stands to benefit employers who sign up, as they increase the liklihood of being awarded public procurement contracts in Greater Manchester given that the council may consider the social value of businesses tendering for public contracts. Further, signatories to the Charter will be eligible for investment from its GM Business Fund, which has invested more than £116m in 100-plus businesses over the last few years.

60 businesses in the Greater Manchester Combined Authority volunteered to refrain from using zero-hours contracts.

With 100 more potential signatories in negotiations to adopt the Good Employment Charter, there is speculation that the movement could pick up steam in light of the growing awareness around employees’ welfare. London has a Good Work Standard accreditation scheme and there are also similar good work charters in cities such as Derby, Birmingham and Liverpool. However, Manchester is leading the way with their Good Employment Charter being the most comprehensive scheme.

Whilst good work charters are popular with employees, it is up for debate as to whether employers outside of Manchester will follow suit and consider whether a scheme such as the Good Employment Charter could improve morale and productivity in their organisations.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 09 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

The Arbitration Act 2025 – Factsheet

This factsheet outlines the major reforms and key developments introduced by the Arbitration Act 2025, including updates on summary disposal, jurisdictional challenges, emergency arbitrators, arbitrator disclosure duties, and governing law in arbitration proceedings.

art
  • 09 July 2026
  • Immigration

Right to Work Checks are changing from 1 October 2026: Is your business ready?

The Home Office’s new rules, effective 1 October 2026, will overhaul right to work checks and raise the risk of civil penalties for UK businesses.

art
  • 08 July 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

ICO prosecutes employee under the Data Protection Act for forwarding client data to his personal email address

The issue of employees taking confidential business information or personal data when moving to a new employer remains a significant concern for businesses.

Pub
  • 07 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Accelerating arbitration: Expedited procedures and key changes in the new ICC Rules – Episode 2

In episode 2, Jack Hobbs (Clarkslegal) and Christopher Howitt (Three Stone) explore how the latest expedited and highly expedited procedures under the ICC Arbitration Rules 2026 are transforming the landscape of dispute resolution.

art
  • 07 July 2026
  • Employment

6 month unfair dismissal rights: What employers need to know

Under the new Employment Rights Act 2025 the minimum period of service required to qualify to bring a statutory claim for unfair dismissal has been reduced from 2 full years to 6 months from 1 January 2027 onwards.  

art
  • 02 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Litigation and Artificial Intelligence: Where are we now?

In the recent case of Cork and another v Smith, the High Court publicly admonished a law firm and two of its solicitors after they had produced and submitted two AI-generated letters to the court containing misleading and false information in relation to a block transfer application made under Rule 12.37 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016.