Search

How can we help?

Icon

Knowledge of disability

In the recent case of Baldeh v Churches Housing Association of Dudley and District Ltd, the EAT allowed an appeal by a Claimant against the Tribunal’s decision to reject her claim for disability related discrimination.  Whilst it was found that the Respondent did not have knowledge of the Claimant’s disability (either actual or constructive) prior to dismissing her, it had gained this knowledge when it was told of her depression at the appeal hearing.  As the rejection of her appeal formed part of the Claimant’s complaint of unfavourable treatment, the issue of the Respondent’s knowledge was a relevant factor that should have been considered by the Tribunal. 

The Claimant was employed by the Respondent as a support worker on six months’ probation.  After various concerns had been raised about her performance and behavior towards colleagues, she was called to a review meeting and her employment was terminated at the end of her probationary period.  At her appeal hearing, she told the Respondent that she was suffering from depression which could have influenced her behavior towards her colleagues and affected her short-term memory.  After her appeal was unsuccessful, the Claimant brought a claim for disability related discrimination.

The claim was rejected by the Tribunal, which found that the Respondent did not know and could not reasonably have been expected to know that the Claimant was disabled at the time of her dismissal.  It also said:

  • there was no evidence about her behavior towards her colleagues “arose in consequence of” her disability;
  • there were other reasons for her dismissal in addition which were sufficient; and
  • the dismissal was justified as being a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim (ensuring care by the employer for vulnerable people by a professional team)

The claim was rejected by the Tribunal, which found that the Respondent did not know and could not reasonably have been expected to know that the Claimant was disabled at the time of her dismissal.

However, her appeal to the EAT proved more successful.  Having identified a number of errors in the Tribunal’s reasoning, the EAT chose to remit the case back to be heard by a fresh tribunal.  It held that:

  • whilst the Respondent did not know about the Claimant’s disability at the time of the dismissal, they had acquired actual or constructive knowledge of it before the rejection of her appeal (which formed part of the unfavourable treatment she was complaining of);
  • there was in fact some evidence that her depression caused the relevant behavior which the Tribunal ought to have considered;
  • it was sufficient for the “something arising in consequence” of the disability to have a “material influence” on the unfavourable treatment: the fact that there may have been other causes as well was not an answer to the claim; and
  • the Tribunal had failed to address the question as to whether the Claimant’s dismissal was a proportionate response

Should you have any questions or concerns about how to manage disabled employees who may be subject to disciplinary proceedings, please do get in contact with a member of our Employment Team.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 29 July 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

Articles of Association v. Shareholders Agreement in England and Wales: Which one works best for you and your company?

The decision of whether to solely rely on a company’s Articles of Association or implement a bespoke Shareholders’ Agreement depends on the specific needs and priorities of the individual shareholders and the company alike.

Pub
  • 28 July 2025
  • Employment

Talking Employment Law: The Employment Rights Bill – Part 3

In part three of the Employment Rights Bill podcast series, Louise Keenan and Lucy White, members of the employment team, will discuss changes to fire and re-hire practices, harassment, zero-hour contracts and tribunal limitation periods.

art
  • 24 July 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

Deal Announcement: Clarkslegal’s corporate lawyers advise on the sale of Just Construction Recruitment Ltd to ASAP TT SAS

Clarkslegal’s corporate team is pleased to have advised the shareholders of Just Construction Recruitment Ltd on the sale of the company to French based, ASAP TT SAS.

art
  • 23 July 2025
  • Immigration

Home Office Announces Major Changes to Skilled Worker Route

On 1 July 2025, the Home Office released a new Statement of Changes (HC 997), delivering on the first phase of what the government calls a “sweeping reform” to the immigration system, as set out in the May 2025 Immigration White Paper. The changes to the Immigration Rules were enforced on 22 July 2025.

art
  • 21 July 2025
  • Employment

When the ‘Kiss Cam’ Captures More Than Just a Moment: Romantic Relationships in the Workplace and the Legal Risks

Imagine this: A packed Coldplay concert. Tens of thousands of fans. Suddenly, the “kiss cam” camera pans to the crowd and lands on a man and woman sharing an affectionate embrace.

Pub
  • 15 July 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

Preparing your professional services firm for sale

In our latest podcast, join Stuart Mullins and Nicky Goringe Larkin as they explore the complexities of valuing and preparing professional services firms for the market, whether for sale, merger, venture, or fundraising.