Search

How can we help?

Icon

IR35: control comes at a £920,000 cost

As the April 2020 IR35 changes loom ever larger, there is a lot of attention on challenges under the current system to the tax arrangements of consultants providing work through their own personal service companies.

In our previous article about a television presenter being pursued by HMRC for tax payments, the Claimant’s arrangements with the BBC were held to be self-employment rather than an employment relationship.

However, in the recent case of Paya Limited and others v HMRC [2019], the tax tribunal has found that three presenters who were engaged by the BBC through personal service companies were employees for the purpose of tax.

Whilst the presenters had argued that they were self-employed, the tribunal ruled that the ‘assumed relationships were ones of employment’ because the BBC:

  • retained creative control
  • instructed the presenters on how the work was to be carried out and when
  • had the right to prevent the presenters from working for any other broadcaster.

The presenters and the BBC were collectively liable for £920,000 in unpaid taxes.

The tribunal ruled that the ‘assumed relationships were ones of employment’.

It also stated that the BBC had effectively required the presenters to be engaged through personal service companies due to an “imbalance of bargaining power”. Since the judgment, the BBC has acknowledged its responsibility for the contracts, and it has said it will help the presenters resolve the cases, with two-thirds of the bill reportedly already settled.

This case could have implications for more than 100 other presenters who work under personal service companies and may now face a large tax bill.

Businesses are advised to actively prepare for the IR35 changes that will take place in April 2020 by reviewing their contracts and relationships with contractors. For more information on how to prepare for IR35 changes in advance of April 2020, get in touch with our Employment department.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 23 October 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Section 172 Companies Act 2006: Key lessons from Saxon Woods v Costa

The Supreme Court’s decision in Saxon Woods v Costa UKSC 21 clarifies directors’ duties under Section 172 Companies Act 2006, confirming that good faith requires both honest belief and appropriate conduct.

art
  • 22 October 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Shareholders’ Agreements for Founders and Investors – SHA Series Part 3 of 5

A shareholders’ agreement is arguably one of the most valuable corporate governance agreements (along with articles of association) in any private UK company with more than one shareholder.

art
  • 19 October 2026
  • Immigration

Right to Work Checks: Are UK businesses becoming immigration enforcement officers?

The UK’s Right to Work regime has undergone a significant expansion, with changes taking effect from 1 October 2026.

art
  • 15 October 2026

Clarkslegal celebrates continued success in Chambers and Partners UK 2027

Clarkslegal is delighted to announce that we have once again been recognised by Chambers and Partners UK 2027, celebrating continued success across the firm and a number of enhanced individual rankings.

Pub
  • 15 October 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Data breaches and ICO investigations: Responding with confidence

In this podcast Harry Berryman and Zahra Navarro discuss recent ICO enforcement action, common causes of data breaches, and the practical steps organisations should take to respond effectively when incidents occur.

art
  • 14 October 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

London Court of International Arbitration v International Chamber of Commerce: Key differences

Compare LCIA and ICC arbitration rules, costs, confidentiality provisions and expedited procedures. Learn the key differences between these leading international arbitration institutions and how to choose the right option for your commercial dispute.