Search

How can we help?

Icon

IR35: control comes at a £920,000 cost

As the April 2020 IR35 changes loom ever larger, there is a lot of attention on challenges under the current system to the tax arrangements of consultants providing work through their own personal service companies.

In our previous article about a television presenter being pursued by HMRC for tax payments, the Claimant’s arrangements with the BBC were held to be self-employment rather than an employment relationship.

However, in the recent case of Paya Limited and others v HMRC [2019], the tax tribunal has found that three presenters who were engaged by the BBC through personal service companies were employees for the purpose of tax.

Whilst the presenters had argued that they were self-employed, the tribunal ruled that the ‘assumed relationships were ones of employment’ because the BBC:

  • retained creative control
  • instructed the presenters on how the work was to be carried out and when
  • had the right to prevent the presenters from working for any other broadcaster.

The presenters and the BBC were collectively liable for £920,000 in unpaid taxes.

The tribunal ruled that the ‘assumed relationships were ones of employment’.

It also stated that the BBC had effectively required the presenters to be engaged through personal service companies due to an “imbalance of bargaining power”. Since the judgment, the BBC has acknowledged its responsibility for the contracts, and it has said it will help the presenters resolve the cases, with two-thirds of the bill reportedly already settled.

This case could have implications for more than 100 other presenters who work under personal service companies and may now face a large tax bill.

Businesses are advised to actively prepare for the IR35 changes that will take place in April 2020 by reviewing their contracts and relationships with contractors. For more information on how to prepare for IR35 changes in advance of April 2020, get in touch with our Employment department.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 14 February 2025
  • Immigration

Bringing your Valentine to the UK

This year, thousands of couples have to spend Valentine’s day alone, due to the UK’s strict Immigration rules.

art
  • 14 February 2025
  • Employment

How to manage romance in the workplace

We spend most of our time at work, whether that be in the workplace or remotely via teams or slack. With all this time to chat and get to know colleagues, it comes as no surprise that romance has become commonplace in the modern workplace.

art
  • 13 February 2025
  • Public Procurement

Procurement Act 2023 – Coming into force on 24 February 2025

After a four-month delay from its original commencement date of 28 October 2024, the new Procurement Act 2023 is now due to come into force later this month on 24 February 2025.

art
  • 13 February 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

What are restrictive covenants and how do they relate to the planning system?

Restrictive covenants on use can be one of the more problematic aspects of a property transaction. Even if the restrictive covenants do not affect one’s development plans for the land, they may be an issue for subsequent buyers or future lenders.

art
  • 13 February 2025
  • Immigration

Skilled Worker New Entrant Exemption – is it a good investment?

The “new entrant” exemption under the UK Skilled Worker Visa is a vital but often underappreciated element of the immigration system. It offers valuable benefits to both employers and employees.

art
  • 12 February 2025
  • Employment

Balancing the Equality Act: Lessons from Higgs v Farmor’s School

The Court of Appeal have today issued a judgment in the Kristie Higgs v Farmor’s School case, in which it has ruled that the actions of the school in dismissing Ms Higgs for expressing LGBT+ critical posts on her personal Facebook account, was unlawful discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief.