How can we help?


HSE finds college broke Covid-19 health and safety rules  

The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) is responsible for regulating and enforcing safety in the workplace. Following the tragic death of Donna Coleman, a teacher who worked at Burnley College, the University and College Union (UCU) raised Covid-19 health and safety concerns with the college and the HSE. 

Background and the HSE’s findings  

The HSE conducted an investigation and found that the college had broken health and safety legislation in relation to Covid failings. Its findings were detailed in a letter dated 26 April 2022 published by the UCU. 

Ms Coleman, who worked with vulnerable students at Burnley College, died aged 42 in January 2021 after testing positive for Covid 19 on 14 December 2020. It is reported that Ms Coleman had been required to share a ‘relatively small’ office with two other colleagues which “didn’t allow for social distancing” and the only ventilation was a window ‘which relied on the confidence of employees to open the window during the winter months’.  

The HSE also had sight of a photo which showed members of staff including Ms Coleman standing “side by side” at a meeting and video footage of a Christmas party held by the college in which persons were not socially distancing.  

Ultimately the HSE held that the college had failed to ensure, so far as reasonably practicably, the health, safety and welfare of their employees at work. This was on the basis that they had not implemented necessary measures to prevent the spread of Covid-19 such as: 

  • Failing to meet social distancing requirements; 
  • Failing to inform close contacts of positive covid cases; 
  • Failing to monitor and enforce the wearing of face coverings. 

The letter of the HSE details that Burnley College are required to pay a fee as a consequence of their contravention of health and safety laws. 


The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 confirms that it is the duty of every employer to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all employees.

Implication for employers 

Although the HSE report was ‘inconclusive’ on whether Ms Coleman contracted the virus at work, employers would be well advised to consider this tragic case as a stark reminder of the importance of their obligations in relation to workplace safety.  

The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 confirms that it is the duty of every employer to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all employees. In order for an employer to discharge such duties, they must ensure they take steps to consider how they might minimise risks such as Covid-19.  

Employers should take care to ensure any rules are properly implemented and staff are adequality trained to ensure compliance with such rules. If an employer finds that an employee is breaching any such health and safety rules they should ensure they follow up with appropriate action in line with their disciplinary procedure. 

Whilst there is no longer a requirement for employers to explicitly consider Covid-19 in their health and safety risk assessment (save for sectors whose employees work with Covid-19), we would recommend that employers continue to undertake risk assessments to minimise the risk as far as possible. 

The current guidance maintains that employers should control health and safety risks though cleaning, ventilation and welfare facilities and that they may still wish to consider the needs of more vulnerable employees who are at higher risk of serious illness from Covid-19. 

Contact our employment team for legal advice on health and safety obligations in your workplace.

About this article

This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

  • 01 June 2023
  • Employment

Facts employees should know about their personal data

We previously published an article on facts an employer should know about holding personal data, so it is only fair that we also write about the other side of the coin – facts employees should know as individuals whose personal data is held by their employer.

  • 01 June 2023
  • Immigration

What is the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) and how much do you have to pay?

The Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) is a levy on companies who sponsor migrant workers. This levy was imposed on 6 April 2017. The Government states that the charge has been levied to contribute towards addressing the skills gap in the local economy.

  • 26 May 2023
  • Employment

Avoiding discrimination in flexible working requests

The right to request flexible working is currently available to employees with at least 26 weeks’ service and is set to be extended further under new Government reforms.

  • 25 May 2023
  • Corporate and M&A

Management Buyout – Top 5 things to consider

A management buyout is a financial transaction in which a member of the management team purchases the company from its registered owner. MBO’s usually occur in private companies in an effort to enhance profitability and simplify strategies.

  • 25 May 2023
  • Employment

Carer’s Leave Bill set to become law

On 19 May 2023, the Carer’s Leave Bill had its third reading in the House of Lords, and upon receiving Royal Assent, will become law. There is not yet a date for the implementation of this bill, however it is likely that this will happen relatively quickly upon receiving Royal Assent, so is definitely one to keep an eye on.

  • 18 May 2023
  • Immigration

Navigating SOC Codes

When it comes to UK immigration, understanding the intricacies of the system is vital. One significant aspect of the process revolves around Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) codes. SOC codes play a crucial role in determining the eligibility for an individual to apply for a work visa, assessing skill levels, and matching individuals to appropriate job roles.