Search

How can we help?

Icon

Greek government falls short with discriminatory height requirement for police

The ECJ has held in Ypourgos Ethnikis Pedias kai Thriskevmaton v Kalliri that a minimum height requirement of 170cm imposed by the Greek Government for men and women wishing to join the police force, amounted to indirect sex discrimination and could not be objectively justified.

The case concerned a women who applied to the Greek police academy, however was rejected as she was only 168cm tall, falling 2cm short of the Government’s 170cm minimum height requirement. The ECJ held that having a required height for all applicants “constitutes indirect sex discrimination since it works to the disadvantage of far more women than men.”

The ECJ held that having a required height for all applicants “constitutes indirect sex discrimination since it works to the disadvantage of far more women than men.

The ECJ additionally stated that the minimum height requirement could not be justified on the basis of being “either appropriate or necessary for the objective it had purported to achieve”, namely ensuring that aspiring police officers had the physical capability for the job. The Court did however note that specific tests of candidates’ physical ability could be used instead of height limit, for example various fitness tests for candidates.

This case serves as a reminder to employers that any restrictions which cannot be objectively justified may amount to indirect discrimination.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 29 April 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

UK Data Protection – what’s new?

Having come into force on 19 June 2025, it comes as no surprise that we are now seeing the effects of the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 (‘DUAA’). This article highlights a few of DUAA’s fundamental reforms, delves into one in particular, and examines how this will impact the recruitment sphere.

art
  • 29 April 2026
  • Employment

Employment Rights Act: Changing key contract terms will be harder from January 2027

The Employment Rights Act 2025 (“ERA 2025”) introduces a new regime that restricts how employers can change certain core contractual terms, with the key provisions now expected to commence on 1 January 2027.

art
  • 28 April 2026
  • Immigration

Proposed expansion of right to work checks from 1 October 2026: what employers need to know

The Home Office has published a consultation on a draft Code of Practice addressing how employers can avoid unlawful discrimination while preventing illegal working. The draft indicates a planned expansion of right to work (RTW) check obligations to take effect from 1 October 2026.

Pub
  • 27 April 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Quarterly Insights: Key Corporate & Commercial Topics – Q2 2026

Join Stuart Mullins and Emma Docking as they explore key corporate and commercial topics, including SME growth and exit strategies for 2026, EMI schemes for employee incentives, and the importance of drag along and tag along rights.

art
  • 22 April 2026
  • Commercial Real Estate

Historic rent reviews: A warning for tenants

We have been asked whether a landlord is able to operate historic rent reviews. 

art
  • 14 April 2026
  • Employment

Updates to Vento Bands 2026: Injury to feelings awards

For discrimination and detriment cases, compensation can also cover non-financial losses, which, in most cases, will include an injury to feelings award.