Search

How can we help?

Icon

Government to further scrutinise transactions and investments

Last month the Government introduced the National Security and Investment Bill to the House of Commons for its first reading. The purpose of the Bill is to give the government further powers to scrutinise and, where necessary, intervene in certain business transactions if it believes national security concerns are present; this will include mergers and acquisitions.

The UK’s current powers derive from law that is now 18 years old. Unsurprisingly the Government has branded current powers not fit for purpose to ‘address the challenging and changing national security threats the UK faces’. The new reforms will bring the UK in line with its allies’ approach to investment screening.

New powers

The key power outlined by the Bill is that the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy will be able to ’call in‘ any acquisitions of control where it is reasonably suspected that there is a risk to national security as a result of the acquisition.

Currently, the Government is not able to intervene unless specific thresholds, that include turnover or share in supply of products, are met. As such, small to medium size enterprises, who despite working in high risk areas, are largely devoid of government scrutiny.

These thresholds have been removed, as has the mandatory involvement of the Competition and Markets Authority unless there are competition concerns, and the ability to intervene in asset acquisitions.

Here are the key areas that power will only be used:

  1. Risk level of the target company, i.e. which area of the economy the acquisition entity operates in (sectors such as advanced robotics, military or energy are likely to be subject to higher scrutiny).
  2. Risk level of the trigger event, this includes the type or level of control being acquired. The Government has outlined a list of trigger events such as acquisition of 75% or more of the votes of shares in a company, or the acquisition of material influence over a qualifying entity’s policy. When it comes to analysing a ’material influence‘ the following factors might be considered:
    • The distribution of shareholdings and voting patterns,
    • The existence of any special veto powers, or
    • The extent of board representation.
  3. The risk level of the acquirer, likely to include an analysis of the acquirer’s country of origin or where it operates its own business dealings, to the extent that these would pose an additional risk to national security.

The new reforms will bring the UK in line with its allies’ approach to investment screening.

How might this affect your business transactions?

The Bill, and accompanying regime, actively encourages all businesses to notify the government if an acquisition of control takes place. However, for transactions in specific high-risk sectors (due to be outlined in full in secondary legislation once the bill has received royal assent) the Bill will require a business to submit a formal notification. Once the Government has received a notification they will have a period of 30 days to decide whether or not the transaction posses a risk to national security. Criminal and civil sanctions bolster the governments arsenal in the event of non-compliance with an acquisition notification.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 12 June 2024
  • Privacy and Data Protection

UK data protection: Important basics

Sometimes, data protection can seem like unhelpful red tape. At other times, it is critical to cultivating a trustworthy reputation.

art
  • 11 June 2024
  • Immigration

UK Immigration Roundup – May to June 2024

As the UK approaches the upcoming general election, immigration remains a focal issue in political discussions. The Conservative party’s recent proposal to cap visas for skilled migrant workers has alarmed various industries who are concerned that a limit to migration could harm vital sectors of the UK economy.

Pub
  • 06 June 2024
  • Employment

Talking Employment Law: What does the new Worker Protection Act 2023 mean for employers?

In this podcast, Lucy Densham Brown and Shauna Jones, members of the employment team, will review the new Worker Protection Act 2023 and provide some guidance on how employers should review their policies in preparation for October.

art
  • 03 June 2024
  • Commercial Real Estate

Sustainability and commercial property: green leases  

Climate change is considered by many the biggest threat we are facing today. With the UK said to have one of the oldest housing/building stocks, the focus on a building’s environmental performance and sustainability has never been more critical.

art
  • 03 June 2024
  • Employment

Using AI technologies in recruitment: is it fair and transparent?

In a rapidly evolving digital landscape, where artificial intelligence (AI) plays an increasingly pivotal role in HR and recruitment processes, ensuring responsible and ethical implementation is paramount.

Pub
  • 03 June 2024
  • Employment

Navigating the Labour Party’s New Deal for Working People: Legal implications and opportunities

Join Monica Atwal and Amanda Glover, for this in-person seminar on ‘Navigating the Labour Party’s New Deal for Working People: Legal Implications and Opportunities’ at our Reading office on Thursday, 20th June.