Search

How can we help?

Icon

Government responds to consultation extending parents’ redundancy protection

Earlier this year the Government ran a consultation on how and whether to extend the redundancy protection for pregnant women and new parents. It has now published its response.

As a recommendation born out of the Taylor Review of Modern Working Practices, the response stresses that the government is committed to bringing forward new protection through applicable legislation “when parliamentary time allows”. Alas therefore, this is unlikely to see the light of day until phrases such as “Brexit” and “no-deal” have been ousted from current parliamentary vocabulary. Nevertheless, there is value in knowing, understanding, and preparing for the government’s plans.

Jacob Montague

Senior Solicitor

View profile

+44 118 960 4613

The government is committed to bringing forward new protection through applicable legislation “when parliamentary time allows”.

The key responses:

  1. The government will ensure the redundancy protection period will apply from the point the employee informs the employer that she is pregnant, whether orally or in writing. Additionally, there will be an extension of the redundancy protection period to six months once a new mother has returned to work. Crucially employers and employees will have to carefully consider how the oral conversation might be evidenced should its existence be called into question.
  2. The government will also seek to extend the redundancy period for six months following a return to work from adoption leave, promoting parenting parity.
  3. Shared Parental Leave is still a contentious and complicated issue. The government however does propose to extend the redundancy protection period for those returning from shared parental leave, but recognises that there are issues of proportionality. The example given is that it would not be proportionate to offer the same amount of protection to a father returning from one week’s shared parental leave, as they might a mother returning after 12 months’ maternity leave.
  4. After reviewing the responses, the government recognised that information on such parental protection was often sparse and many struggled to find the information. The government admitted that this needed to change, and suggested information should be more readily available at, by way of example, schools and GP surgeries.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Jacob Montague

Senior Solicitor

View profile

+44 118 960 4613

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 13 February 2025
  • Public Procurement

Procurement Act 2023 – Coming into force on 24 February 2025

After a four-month delay from its original commencement date of 28 October 2024, the new Procurement Act 2023 is now due to come into force later this month on 24 February 2025.

art
  • 13 February 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

What are restrictive covenants and how do they relate to the planning system?

Restrictive covenants on use can be one of the more problematic aspects of a property transaction. Even if the restrictive covenants do not affect one’s development plans for the land, they may be an issue for subsequent buyers or future lenders.

art
  • 13 February 2025
  • Immigration

Skilled Worker New Entrant Exemption – is it a good investment?

The “new entrant” exemption under the UK Skilled Worker Visa is a vital but often underappreciated element of the immigration system. It offers valuable benefits to both employers and employees.

art
  • 12 February 2025
  • Employment

Balancing the Equality Act: Lessons from Higgs v Farmor’s School

The Court of Appeal have today issued a judgment in the Kristie Higgs v Farmor’s School case, in which it has ruled that the actions of the school in dismissing Ms Higgs for expressing LGBT+ critical posts on her personal Facebook account, was unlawful discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief.

Pub
  • 10 February 2025
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Frequently asked questions on data retention

In this podcast, Jesse Akiwumi and Harry Berryman, members of the Data Protection team at Clarkslegal, address the top frequently asked questions we receive about data retention.

art
  • 10 February 2025
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

We are living in a material world, but am I a material breach?

In this article we will be looking at the meaning of these different types of breach.