Search

How can we help?

Icon

Government responds to consultation extending parents’ redundancy protection

Earlier this year the Government ran a consultation on how and whether to extend the redundancy protection for pregnant women and new parents. It has now published its response.

As a recommendation born out of the Taylor Review of Modern Working Practices, the response stresses that the government is committed to bringing forward new protection through applicable legislation “when parliamentary time allows”. Alas therefore, this is unlikely to see the light of day until phrases such as “Brexit” and “no-deal” have been ousted from current parliamentary vocabulary. Nevertheless, there is value in knowing, understanding, and preparing for the government’s plans.

The government is committed to bringing forward new protection through applicable legislation “when parliamentary time allows”.

The key responses:

  1. The government will ensure the redundancy protection period will apply from the point the employee informs the employer that she is pregnant, whether orally or in writing. Additionally, there will be an extension of the redundancy protection period to six months once a new mother has returned to work. Crucially employers and employees will have to carefully consider how the oral conversation might be evidenced should its existence be called into question.
  2. The government will also seek to extend the redundancy period for six months following a return to work from adoption leave, promoting parenting parity.
  3. Shared Parental Leave is still a contentious and complicated issue. The government however does propose to extend the redundancy protection period for those returning from shared parental leave, but recognises that there are issues of proportionality. The example given is that it would not be proportionate to offer the same amount of protection to a father returning from one week’s shared parental leave, as they might a mother returning after 12 months’ maternity leave.
  4. After reviewing the responses, the government recognised that information on such parental protection was often sparse and many struggled to find the information. The government admitted that this needed to change, and suggested information should be more readily available at, by way of example, schools and GP surgeries.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 15 September 2025
  • Immigration

Sharp rise in Sponsor Licence Revocations – What employers need to know

The Home Office has reported a record number of sponsor licence revocations over the past year, as part of its intensified efforts to crack down on abuse of the UK’s immigration system.

art
  • 10 September 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

Trouble at the Table: The Challenges Facing the UK Hospitality Sector in the run up to Christmas 2025

The UK hospitality sector, long celebrated for its vibrancy and resilience, is facing a perfect storm of economic, operational, and structural challenges in 2025.

art
  • 09 September 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

Le bail commercial anglais: quelques points essentiels à considérer

Typiquement, les baux commerciaux en Angleterre sont de court terme, d’une durée de 5 ou 10 ans, avec un loyer de marché et des ajustements du loyer périodiques en fonction de l’inflation ou d’autres facteurs. 

art
  • 09 September 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

The Failure to Prevent Fraud Offence – be prepared to avoid criminal liability

The failure to prevent fraud offence is a new corporate offence which has come into force on 1 September 2025.

art
  • 08 September 2025
  • Employment

Can employers still make changes to contracts after the Employment Rights Bill?

The short answer is yes but it will be much more difficult for employers following the introduction of the Employment Rights Bill because their ability to fairly dismiss employees who do not agree contractual changes is being restricted. 

art
  • 05 September 2025
  • Privacy and Data Protection

When Ignoring a DSAR Becomes a Criminal Offence

On 3 September 2025, Mr Jason Blake appeared at Beverley Magistrates Court and was fined for failing to respond to a data subject access request (DSAR).