Search

How can we help?

Icon

Planned expansion of the Fixed Recoverable Costs scheme

One of the key upcoming changes set to affect dispute resolution in 2022 is the planned expansion to the fixed recoverable costs (FRC) regime.

FRC regimes set out the legal costs a successful party will be able to recover from the unsuccessful party at different stages of the litigation process.

The current regime predominantly applies in low-value personal injury (PI) claims and undefended monetary claims, but new Government proposals will mean the use of FRC will be significantly expanded.

At present, the Government is working towards implementing the proposed changes in October 2022, with the changes set to affect claims where the cause of action (such as the accident or the debt accruing) takes place post-implementation.

Expansion of FRC to the fast track

Under the proposed changes, all fast-track civil claims valued between £10,000 – £25,000 would be subject to FRC. Each claim will be assessed and placed into one of four bands, depending on their complexity.

The proposed bands are as follows:

Banding  Type of claim
Band 1  Non- PI Road Traffic Accident claims, defended debt claims
Band 2 PI Road Traffic Accident claims (covered by the Pre-Action Protocol for PI), holiday sickness claims
Band 3 PI Road Traffic Accident claims (outside the Protocol), employer’s liability accident claims, public liability claims, housing disrepair, other money claims
Band 4 Employer’s liability disease claims (with the exception of noise-induced hearing loss claims), complex housing repair or tracked possessions claims, professional negligence claims, property disputes etc

 

The legal costs a party can recover under the FRC will depend on the banding and the stage the proceedings come to an end and will be a mixture of a fixed figure and a percentage of damages awarded. For claimants, the percentage will apply to the amount recovered, and for defendants, it will apply to the value as set out in the Particulars of Claim.

The Government is working towards implementing the proposed changes in October 2022, with the changes set to affect claims where the cause of action (such as the accident or the debt accruing) takes place post-implementation.

Extension of the fast track

The fast track itself will also be expanded to include Intermediate cases, valued between £25,000 and £100,000 in damages. These intermediate cases will also be subject to banding according to complexity in the following way:

Banding 

Type of claim

Band 1 Simple claims with one issue and likely to be one day or less at trial e.g., debt claims or quantum-only PI
Bands 2 and 3 Usual intermediate cases, with straightforward claims in Band 2 and more complex in Band 3
Band 4 Cases with serious factual or legal issues and the trial is likely to last around 3 days

 

The parties will be allowed to challenge the band the claim is allocated to, but there will be penalties if the party is unsuccessful – £150 for fast track, and £300 for intermediate cases.

Uplifts and escape

The Government are also planning to allow uplifts on the costs awarded in certain circumstances. This would include cases where one party has behaved unreasonably (a 50% uplift), where there are additional claimants on the same set of facts (25% per claimant) and a London weighting (12.5%).

Parties will also be allowed to escape the proposed FRC in exceptional circumstances, under the existing process.

The new FRC regimes are being implemented with a view to increasing the certainty around costs in these proceedings, as well as ensuring costs remain proportional to the issues at hand. While the impact of such changes remains to be seen, the Government have indicated it may consider further expansion of FRC regimes in future.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 19 May 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

Thinking of exiting your business? Part 2

In the second instalment of our three-part series, join Stuart Mullins from Clarkslegal and Nicky Goringe Larkin from Succession Planning as they discuss the complexities surrounding business financing, accounting practices, and valuation strategies, along with key insights into private equity.

Pub
  • 16 May 2025
  • Employment

London Seminar – Understanding the Employment Rights Bill: Legal changes and what they mean for HR

We are pleased to invite you to an in-person seminar at our London office on Tuesday 24th June, hosted by our Employment Law team. Join Monica Atwal, Managing Partner; Katie Glendinning, Partner; and Amanda Glover, Associate, as they unpack the legal implications of the new Employment Rights Bill and what it means for your organisation.

Pub
  • 16 May 2025
  • Employment

Reading Seminar – Understanding the Employment Rights Bill: Legal changes and what they mean for HR

We are pleased to invite you to an in-person seminar at our Reading office Tuesday 17th June hosted by our Employment Law team. Join Monica Atwal, Managing Partner, Katie Glendinning, Partner and Amanda Glover, Associate, will unpack the legal implications of the new Employment Rights Bill and what it means for your organisation.

art
  • 15 May 2025
  • Immigration

The 2025 Immigration White Paper: A Turning Point in UK Immigration Policy

On 12 May 2025, the UK Government unveiled its White Paper titled “Restoring Control Over the Immigration System”, outlining the most substantial proposed changes to immigration law since the post-Brexit overhaul.

Pub
  • 15 May 2025
  • Employment

TUPE Podcast Series – Information and Consultation Obligations

In this ninth episode of our TUPE Podcast Series, Katie Glendinning, a Partner in the employment team, will examine the information and consultation obligations under TUPE.

art
  • 15 May 2025
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Ashley v HMRC – The High Court clarifies the scope of Data Subject Access Requests

DSARs are very rarely the subject of litigation, and they are even rarer in the High Court, so the case of Ashley v HMRC is a valuable decision for both data subjects and data controllers.