Search

How can we help?

Icon

What happens if I fail jobs drug test?

It’s the morning after the night before, and you’ve done something that really wasn’t a good idea. And it just so happens that today is the one day in your career that your boss has decided to randomly drug test some of the workers.

Just your luck, right?

Well, it is completely legal for employers to request drugs tests from its staff when it has grounds to suspect substance abuse.

But if you do end up testing positive, the good news is that it does not necessarily mean you will be sacked on the spot.

Why you might be tested

Testing could be completely random, or it could be implemented because bosses suspect a staff member was inebriated while working.

However, drug testing is not yet sophisticated enough to determine when an individual was drunk or high – so it can be hard to prove it happened on company time.

Monica Atwal, managing partner and employment law specialist at Clarkslegal, told Metro.co.uk: ‘Some employers only test if there are other indicators of abuse or influence.

‘But others will randomly test so there is confidence that staff can perform critical roles such as drivers or those providing personal care such as nurses.’

Will you be sacked?

Companies will have differing policies, but there is a good chance that being under the influence on the job constitutes gross misconduct, and you will be sacked.

But it may depend on the type of drug, whether it was taken in or out of the workplace, and your job.

Ms Atwal said: ‘Employers will be under a duty to investigate the circumstances fully before taking disciplinary action.

‘An employee can face disciplinary action including dismissal if a test is positive and the investigation shows there was a clear rule and a fair process was followed.

‘It is highly likely that if you are under the influence at work you will lose your job. It’s a high price to pay for a high.’

Read full article here.

Chambers and Partners

“Very professional, knowledgeable and accessible lawyers.” 

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

Monica Atwal

Managing Partner

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 28 August 2026
  • Immigration

Right to Work and Sponsor Licence Changes 2026: Key dates for businesses

In this podcast, immigration solicitors Ruth Karimatsenga and Monica Mastropasqua discuss the key immigration compliance changes coming into force in September and October 2026 and what employers, HR teams, sponsors and individuals should do to prepare.

art
  • 28 August 2026
  • Commercial Real Estate

Modernising security of tenure: The Law Commission’s follow up consultation paper

On 16th June 2026, the Commission published its second consultation paper: Business Tenancies: the right to renew – modernising security of tenure.

Pub
  • 27 August 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

The Highly Expedited Arbitration Provisions – ICC Rules 2026 – Factsheet

This factsheet provides an overview of the ICC’s Highly Expedited Arbitration Provisions (HEAP), outlining some of the key procedural features introduced by Appendix VI of the 2026 Rules and the potential benefits of this new expedited process.

art
  • 27 August 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

EMIs – April 2026 changes explained

On 6 April 2026 the Enterprise Management Incentive scheme (EMI) was expanded to make EMIs accessible to a wider range of businesses.

art
  • 19 August 2026
  • Employment

Managing employee redundancies: Frequently asked questions (FAQs)

Redundancy should be an employer’s last option when restructuring their business. There are necessary steps that should be taken to ensure that redundancy is the best move forward

art
  • 18 August 2026
  • Immigration

Home Office curtailment of Sponsored Workers’ permission: Why employers and employees must act quickly

The Home Office has recently changed the speed at which it processes sponsor notifications following the end of a sponsored worker’s employment.