Search

How can we help?

Icon

Failing to anonymise – the cost

A woman has received £75,000 in an out-of-court settlement after details of domestic abuse she had suffered were revealed by Greater Manchester Police (GMP) without her permission.

In 2014, the woman agreed with the GMP that it could use her experience in a training session for police officers and support agencies. She hoped this would help improve the support given to victims of domestic violence in the future but gave her consent on the understanding that the materials would be anonymised.

However, she later discovered that her identity and medical history had been disclosed in full and to a wider audience.  Also, those attending the session heard a recording of a 999 call she had made after she had been assaulted.

The woman alleged that she had suffered psychiatric harm and brought a claim for misuse of private information, breach of confidential information and non-compliance with the Data Protection Act 1998.

GMP admitted breaching her privacy but refused to admit that she was entitled to any damages (arguing that she had suffered no loss).  However, just days before the hearing, it settled out-of-court for £75,000.

GMP admitted breaching her privacy but refused to admit that she was entitled to any damages (arguing that she had suffered no loss).

This is believed to be one of the largest payments by a British force in a privacy case and serves as a reminder that employers should ensure that they have adequate training in place on data protection obligations .  Mistakes in this area can prove to be costly.  Earlier this year, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust was fined £180,000 after it revealed the email addresses of 781 users of an HIV service.

For useful data protection factsheets, checklists and templates, please visit employmentbuddy.com

For further advice on how to protect your business against data protection and privacy claims, please contact our employment lawyers on employment@clarkslegal.com

Disclaimer

This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 12 November 2025
  • Employment

GDPR: Who are data controllers and processors?

Controllers and processors have a different set of responsibilities, and have various responsibilities when dealing with data breaches.

Pub
  • 11 November 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

The Autumn Budget 2025: Key considerations for business buyers and sellers

Join Stuart Mullins and Nicky Goringe Larkin as they discuss some of the likely implications of the Autumn Budget 2025 for those looking to buy and sell businesses.

art
  • 11 November 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

Directors Duties: Honesty and Goodfaith 

In June the Court of Appeal found that a director had failed to comply with their statutory duty.

art
  • 11 November 2025
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Renters’ Rights Act

We have been closely monitoring the progress of the Renter’s Rights Bill whilst it has been going through Parliament given the major reforms it proposed to the residential rental market in England.

art
  • 10 November 2025
  • Immigration

Immigration Reform Update – Key changes ahead

The UK Government has announced a new wave of immigration reforms, following the publication of the Immigration White Paper in May 2025. These measures represent one of the most significant updates to the immigration system in recent years.

art
  • 07 November 2025
  • Employment

Collective redundancies – a shake-up under the Employment Rights Bill (“the Bill”)

In today’s uncertain economic environment, it is rare to see a week go by without a major employer announcing redundancies, be that as a result a restructuring, a contracting business or a merger or acquisition