Search

How can we help?

Icon

Equality Act – 10 years later

The Equality Act 2010 was designed to simplify and strengthen protection from discrimination, and support progress towards equality.

There is no doubt the Act has played a key role in protecting employees from discrimination over the last 10 years. Countless tribunal cases have been based on its provisions, covering all manner of issues, from single instances of harassment or company-wide discrimination to the abolition of tribunal fees.

In addition, it has created frameworks designed to highlight and address inequalities, such as the creation of gender pay gap reporting obligations.

As it reaches its 10th anniversary, the Act is arguably more relevant today than when first enacted with behaviours and values being constantly challenged. Discrimination cases continue to pour into the tribunal, with recent decisions including the extension of protection to gender fluid people and accepting ethical veganism as a protected belief. The Act appears set to continue in this central role, with major equal pay cases due to be determined in the coming year and the impact of COVID-19 adversely affecting many protected groups.

The Equality Act 2010 was designed to simplify and strengthen protection from discrimination, and support progress towards equality.

However, the Act has not been without criticism. Most recently, the TUC has called it a “missed opportunity”, and pressed the Government to enact certain provisions of the Act that are not currently in force. This includes a duty on public bodies to put the reduction of socio-economic inequality at the forefront on their decision-making, and allowing “dual discrimination” claims to be heard.

With cases continuing to push the boundaries of the legislation, and questions arising over whether it could go even further, it is clear the next 10 years for will be just as intriguing and challenging as the first.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 09 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

The Arbitration Act 2025 – Factsheet

This factsheet outlines the major reforms and key developments introduced by the Arbitration Act 2025, including updates on summary disposal, jurisdictional challenges, emergency arbitrators, arbitrator disclosure duties, and governing law in arbitration proceedings.

art
  • 09 July 2026
  • Immigration

Right to Work Checks are changing from 1 October 2026: Is your business ready?

The Home Office’s new rules, effective 1 October 2026, will overhaul right to work checks and raise the risk of civil penalties for UK businesses.

art
  • 08 July 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

ICO prosecutes employee under the Data Protection Act for forwarding client data to his personal email address

The issue of employees taking confidential business information or personal data when moving to a new employer remains a significant concern for businesses.

Pub
  • 07 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Accelerating arbitration: Expedited procedures and key changes in the new ICC Rules – Episode 2

In episode 2, Jack Hobbs (Clarkslegal) and Christopher Howitt (Three Stone) explore how the latest expedited and highly expedited procedures under the ICC Arbitration Rules 2026 are transforming the landscape of dispute resolution.

art
  • 07 July 2026
  • Employment

6 month unfair dismissal rights: What employers need to know

Under the new Employment Rights Act 2025 the minimum period of service required to qualify to bring a statutory claim for unfair dismissal has been reduced from 2 full years to 6 months from 1 January 2027 onwards.  

art
  • 02 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Litigation and Artificial Intelligence: Where are we now?

In the recent case of Cork and another v Smith, the High Court publicly admonished a law firm and two of its solicitors after they had produced and submitted two AI-generated letters to the court containing misleading and false information in relation to a block transfer application made under Rule 12.37 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016.