Search

How can we help?

Icon

Equality Act – 10 years later

The Equality Act 2010 was designed to simplify and strengthen protection from discrimination, and support progress towards equality.

There is no doubt the Act has played a key role in protecting employees from discrimination over the last 10 years. Countless tribunal cases have been based on its provisions, covering all manner of issues, from single instances of harassment or company-wide discrimination to the abolition of tribunal fees.

In addition, it has created frameworks designed to highlight and address inequalities, such as the creation of gender pay gap reporting obligations.

As it reaches its 10th anniversary, the Act is arguably more relevant today than when first enacted with behaviours and values being constantly challenged. Discrimination cases continue to pour into the tribunal, with recent decisions including the extension of protection to gender fluid people and accepting ethical veganism as a protected belief. The Act appears set to continue in this central role, with major equal pay cases due to be determined in the coming year and the impact of COVID-19 adversely affecting many protected groups.

The Equality Act 2010 was designed to simplify and strengthen protection from discrimination, and support progress towards equality.

However, the Act has not been without criticism. Most recently, the TUC has called it a “missed opportunity”, and pressed the Government to enact certain provisions of the Act that are not currently in force. This includes a duty on public bodies to put the reduction of socio-economic inequality at the forefront on their decision-making, and allowing “dual discrimination” claims to be heard.

With cases continuing to push the boundaries of the legislation, and questions arising over whether it could go even further, it is clear the next 10 years for will be just as intriguing and challenging as the first.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 27 March 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Shareholder Disputes: What to do when disputes arise – Episode 4

Join Stuart Mullins and Jack Hobbs for episode four of our Shareholder Disputes podcast series as they confront the realities of shareholder fallouts and share practical strategies for managing these complex situations.

art
  • 24 March 2026
  • Immigration

Spouse Visa – Is your relationship genuine and subsisting?

For years many couples have become frustrated by the requirements for a spouse visa as the rules and guidance are difficult to understand. A significant amount of applications are rejected on the basis of the applicant not providing the adequate documents to evidence the relationship requirement.

art
  • 20 March 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Drag-Along & Tag-Along Rights: Why Every Company Needs Them

When starting a company, very few founders are aware of the potential issues around shares, share ownership and the implications of that when selling their company.

art
  • 19 March 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

WhatsApp in the Workplace

This article explores the potential risks of using WhatsApp for workplace communications, the implications for GDPR compliance and under UK legislation, and provides practical tips for employers to mitigate these risks.

art
  • 16 March 2026
  • Employment

Trade Union Law Changes from April 2026

April brings the next tranche of reforms under the Employment Rights Act 2025 including changes to the statutory recognition scheme making it easier for trade unions to be recognised in the workplace.

Pub
  • 16 March 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Shareholder Disputes: Managing Shareholder Buyouts and Exits – Episode 3

Join Stuart Mullins and Nicky Goringe Larkin for the third episode of our Shareholder Disputes series, where we move from prevention to resolution—exploring what happens when a founder’s exit becomes unavoidable.