Search

How can we help?

Icon

Employers no longer have to pay National Insurance contributions for apprentices under the age of 25

April 2016 marks a change in the law that is designed to further encourage employers to take on more apprentices. Since 6 April 2016 employers no longer have to pay National Insurance contributions for apprentices under the age of 25 for earnings below £827 per week (£43,000 per year).  It is thought that employers of young apprentices are set to save thousands of pounds in National Insurance contributions as a result of the recent change, and the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills estimates that employers will now save around £1000 a year when employing an apprentice aged under 25 and earning £16,000 per annum.

This is just one of many steps that the Government has taken or is expected to take in attempts to encourage more employers to offer more apprenticeships. By April 2017 the Government intends  to establish the Institute of Apprenticeships; a new independent body led by employers that will ensure the quality of apprenticeships in England. In addition, the Government has also introduced a £10million fund for the purposes of boosting the number of degree apprenticeships available.

The Government has also introduced a £10million fund for the purposes of boosting the number of degree apprenticeships available.

As part of this agenda, the Government has also recently published draft legislation introducing the Apprentice Levy from April 2017, which will be a 0.5% charge on employers’ pay bills in excess of £3m per tax year, which has the stated aim of raising £3bn to fund new apprenticeships and training schemes across the UK.

Apprenticeships are a growing priority of the current Government and are expected to become a more frequent feature in employers’ organisations in the coming years.  If you are thinking of employing apprentices, one of our experienced employment lawyers will be more than happy to discuss this with you and the issues in employing young people generally.

Disclaimer

This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

Monica Atwal

Managing Partner

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 15 September 2025
  • Immigration

Sharp rise in Sponsor Licence Revocations – What employers need to know

The Home Office has reported a record number of sponsor licence revocations over the past year, as part of its intensified efforts to crack down on abuse of the UK’s immigration system.

art
  • 10 September 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

Trouble at the Table: The Challenges Facing the UK Hospitality Sector in the run up to Christmas 2025

The UK hospitality sector, long celebrated for its vibrancy and resilience, is facing a perfect storm of economic, operational, and structural challenges in 2025.

art
  • 09 September 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

Le bail commercial anglais: quelques points essentiels à considérer

Typiquement, les baux commerciaux en Angleterre sont de court terme, d’une durée de 5 ou 10 ans, avec un loyer de marché et des ajustements du loyer périodiques en fonction de l’inflation ou d’autres facteurs. 

art
  • 09 September 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

The Failure to Prevent Fraud Offence – be prepared to avoid criminal liability

The failure to prevent fraud offence is a new corporate offence which has come into force on 1 September 2025.

art
  • 08 September 2025
  • Employment

Can employers still make changes to contracts after the Employment Rights Bill?

The short answer is yes but it will be much more difficult for employers following the introduction of the Employment Rights Bill because their ability to fairly dismiss employees who do not agree contractual changes is being restricted. 

art
  • 05 September 2025
  • Privacy and Data Protection

When Ignoring a DSAR Becomes a Criminal Offence

On 3 September 2025, Mr Jason Blake appeared at Beverley Magistrates Court and was fined for failing to respond to a data subject access request (DSAR).