Search

How can we help?

Icon

IR35: Eamonn Holmes found to be employed for tax purposes

TV presenter Eamonn Holmes has lost his appeal against a 2018 tax tribunal finding that income tax and national insurance was due on his earnings as presenter of This Morning because his contract with ITV amounted to employment for tax purposes.

ITV engaged Mr Holmes via his personal services company, and he argued that he was “totally freelance” and had “total control” over how he acted as a presenter on This Morning. However, in a Judgment of the Upper Tax Tribunal published on 21 February, the Judge found that “there was sufficient mutuality and at least a sufficient framework of control to place the assumed relationship between ITV and Mr Holmes in the employment field.

The Judge said that “On that basis and, having regard to all other relevant factors, my view is that overall, throughout all relevant tax years, the assumed relationship between ITV and Mr Holmes was one of an employment rather than self-employment.”

He argued that he was “totally freelance” and had “total control”.

In essence, the finding is that, if you took the intermediary out of the picture, it was work an employee would be doing.

This highlights how important it is for all businesses which engage consultants and contractors to understand how different working arrangements will affect their financials.

This is a case under law on IR35 as it is at present, meaning that Mr Holmes’ personal service company will have to pay the tax and national insurance due, which is estimated to be in the region of £250,000. Had this been decided under the new IR35 law which will apply from 6 April 2020, it would have been ITV picking up the tab.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 07 August 2026
  • Employment

ACAS Draft New Code on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures

ACAS have published a draft Code on 30 July 2026, which will replace the 2015 ACAS Code on disciplinary and grievance procedures when the Code is finalised at the end of September 2026.

art
  • 06 August 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

The rise of the AI-powered individual: Is your business ready?

Artificial intelligence is changing the data protection landscape, but perhaps not in the way many organisations expected. Much of the discussion has centred on businesses adopting AI and ensuring they comply with the UK GDPR.

Pub
  • 06 August 2026
  • Employment

Employment law changes in 2026: What you need to know

With ongoing changes to UK employment law, staying updated is more challenging than ever. Join Monica Atwal and Harry Berryman for a live webinar covering 2026 HR changes and key employment law updates on Thursday 17 September.

Pub
  • 04 August 2026
  • Employment

From Opportunity to Employment: Building Inclusive Workplaces Together | Hosted by Breakthrough Supported Employment

Join Breakthrough Supported Employment for a live seminar on building inclusive workplaces at Malmaison Reading. Clarkslegal’s Lucy White will speak alongside industry experts, sharing insights on fostering diversity and creating equitable opportunities.

art
  • 04 August 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Advantages of arbitration over litigation

Arbitration is a method of resolving disputes outside the court system, with the dispute being determined by an independent arbitrator or tribunal rather than a judge. Whether a dispute is best resolved through arbitration or litigation will ultimately depend on the particular facts and circumstances of the case.

art
  • 04 August 2026
  • Immigration

Home Office revokes EU Settlement Scheme Status ‘Granted in Error’ – What does This Mean for EU Citizens?

Recent reports that the Home Office has begun revoking the immigration status of some EU nationals on the basis that it was originally “granted in error” have caused understandable concern among immigration practitioners and those with status under the EU Settlement Scheme (EUSS).