How can we help?


Can a dismissal be fair without an appeal hearing? 

Employees with two year’s continuous service have the right not to be unfairly  dismissed (and no length of services is required in cases of ‘automatically unfair’ dismissals). But can a dismissal be deemed fair with an appeal hearing?

The law on unfair dismissal 

To avoid a tribunal finding of unfair dismissal the employer must show three things: 

  • A potentially fair reason to dismiss; 
  • That a fair procedure was followed; 
  • That the dismissal was fair in all the circumstances of the case. 

Many employees are now aware of the importance of following this second requirement – the fair procedure – and will offer the employee the right to appeal.  

In the vast majority of cases this will certainly be the right course of action to take. In the case of Moore v Phoenix Product Development Limited the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) ruled that the dismissal was fair without an appeal hearing. However, the EAT decision should not be taken as a green light to dispel with appeal hearings. The facts in Moore will not fit with most dismissals. 

Moore V Phoenix Product Development Ltd 

The claimant was an inventor who stepped down as CEO of the Respondent company. ?He stayed on as director and employee but was unable to accept that he no longer led the Company.  

Working relations broke down irretrievably and he was dismissed under the category of ‘some other substantial reason’. He was not offered a right to appeal his dismissal as the respondent believed the appeal would be futile. Mr Moore lodged an unfair dismissal claim. He lost.    

Both the tribunal and the EAT agreed with the respondents that an appeal would have been futile. The respondent was able to show evidence of the claimant’s foul and abusive emails, his confrontational behaviour and that he was entirely responsible for the breakdown in relationships.   

Employees with two year’s continuous service have the right not to be unfairly  dismissed.

What should employers do now?  

The safest course of action is to continue to offer employees the right of appeal. Appoint someone of appropriate seniority to hear the appeal who has not previously been involved in the disciplinary hearing.  Make sure the appeal chair explains in writing their reasons for dismissing the appeal if that is their decision.  

If you are sure the Claimant’s behaviour falls into the category of Mr Moore’s making an appeal futile, make sure you have documentary evidence of the unreasonable conduct to justify not offering an appeal.  

Also be aware that even if a tribunal finds that the dismissal was substantively fair it may still impose  financial penalties on an employer who fails to follow a fair procedure. This could be awarding the claimant for loss of earnings to cover the time (typically a few weeks) it would have taken to have arranged and heard the appeal. Or impose a percentage uplift (up to 25%) on any loss of earning compensation for failure to follow the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievances.   

Finally, employers could consider if they should make more use of some substantial other reason (SOSR) as a fair reason for dismissal,  where the circumstances warrant it.  

SOSR is one of the potentially fair reasons for dismissal which is often underused by employers because they are less familiar with it than conduct and capability dismissals. SOSR can be used as a stand-alone reason or as  alternative to use in conjunction with conduct and capability dismissals.  

For legal advice on dismissal and redundancies contact our employment lawyers.  

About this article

This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

  • 01 June 2023
  • Employment

Facts employees should know about their personal data

We previously published an article on facts an employer should know about holding personal data, so it is only fair that we also write about the other side of the coin – facts employees should know as individuals whose personal data is held by their employer.

  • 01 June 2023
  • Immigration

What is the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) and how much do you have to pay?

The Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) is a levy on companies who sponsor migrant workers. This levy was imposed on 6 April 2017. The Government states that the charge has been levied to contribute towards addressing the skills gap in the local economy.

  • 26 May 2023
  • Employment

Avoiding discrimination in flexible working requests

The right to request flexible working is currently available to employees with at least 26 weeks’ service and is set to be extended further under new Government reforms.

  • 25 May 2023
  • Corporate and M&A

Management Buyout – Top 5 things to consider

A management buyout is a financial transaction in which a member of the management team purchases the company from its registered owner. MBO’s usually occur in private companies in an effort to enhance profitability and simplify strategies.

  • 25 May 2023
  • Employment

Carer’s Leave Bill set to become law

On 19 May 2023, the Carer’s Leave Bill had its third reading in the House of Lords, and upon receiving Royal Assent, will become law. There is not yet a date for the implementation of this bill, however it is likely that this will happen relatively quickly upon receiving Royal Assent, so is definitely one to keep an eye on.

  • 18 May 2023
  • Immigration

Navigating SOC Codes

When it comes to UK immigration, understanding the intricacies of the system is vital. One significant aspect of the process revolves around Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) codes. SOC codes play a crucial role in determining the eligibility for an individual to apply for a work visa, assessing skill levels, and matching individuals to appropriate job roles.