- 22 February 2022
- IP and Commercial
The ‘General Director’s Duties’ are still seen by many as the pillars of correct corporate governance. Codified in the Companies Act 2006, these duties apply to executive, non-executive, shadow directors and de-facto directors.
Many companies are still unaware of how these duties work in practice.
For example; a company has two shareholders and directors, who are old friends and appoint another Director (and as shareholder) of the company. To begin with all goes well, but, after 18 months, the appointed Director stops putting in any effort and begins to fail to attend the office or meetings (including board meetings).
Things deteriorate further and it is discovered that the Director has set up his own company and is diverting business opportunities that could be very appropriate from the first company to his new company.
Under the 2006 Act, a director has several general duties:
- Act within his powers (so act in accordance with XYZ Ltd’s constitution and only exercise his powers for their proper purpose)
- Promote the success of XYZ Ltd
- Exercise independent judgment
- Exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence
- Avoid conflicts of interest
- Not to accept any benefit (including a bribe) from a third party which is conferred because of his being a director or his doing or not doing anything as a director
- Declare interests in proposed transactions or arrangements with XYZ Ltd
From the limited information given above, he could well be in breach of several of these general duties by setting up a competing company and directing clients away from his first company.
By doing these things, the director is almost certainly failing to promote the success of the first company. Six factors underpin this duty, and a director is required to have regard to all of these:
- The likely long-term consequences of any decision
- The interests of employees
- The need to foster business relationships with suppliers, customers and others
- The impact of the company’s operations on the community and the environment
- The desirability of maintaining a reputation for high standards of business conduct
- The need to act fairly between members
Under the 2006 Act, a director has several general duties.
The Director is also in breach of his duty to avoid a conflict of interest. A director must avoid a situation in which he or she ‘has, or can have, a direct or indirect interest that conflicts, or possibly may conflict, with the company’s interests.’ This is very broad and covers both actual and potential conflicts and direct and indirect interests. It applies both to a conflict of interest and a conflict of duty, as the Director:
- Has an interest in a commercial opportunity that could also be exploited by the company
- Is, apparently, using, for his own purpose, information belonging to the company
The consequences of a breach of the 2006 Act duties are the same as for breach of the corresponding common law or fiduciary duties.
Action by the company
The duties are owed to the company will be able to enforce them, although in certain circumstances shareholders can bring a derivative action on behalf of a company. Such an action may be brought in respect of negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust by a director of a company. This means that a derivative action may be brought in respect of alleged breach of any of the 2006 Act general duties of directors.
Removal of a Director
Whatever the circumstances, shareholders always have the right to remove a director by shareholder resolution. That right is enshrined in statute and cannot be taken away by a company’s articles. However, the director’s employment rights will, be unaffected by the shareholder vote – so he or she may still have a claim for wrongful and/or unfair dismissal.
Reminder of Directors duties
After a hostile and tough economic climate in 2020 and 2021, it is also important to remember that the general director’s duties will also survive a company’s entry into administration. The judgement in the high court case Re Systems Building Services Group Ltd , serves as a timely reminder that such duties are independent of, although will likely act alongside, the duties any appointed administrator or liquidator.
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.
About this article
SubjectDirector’s duties: A practical example
ExpertiseIP and Commercial
Published22 February 2022
Read, listen and watch our latest insights
- 30 November 2022
- Privacy and Data Protection
Clarkslegal act for a multi-national company on an International Data Transfer Agreement
We recently acted for the UK arm of a multi-national company in connection with the transfer of personal data to an HR services-provider based in the United States.
- 29 November 2022
Employer who shared personal contact details, tribunal rules unfairly dismissed – Monica Atwal writes for People Management
Monica Atwal, Managing Partner at Clarkslegal LLP comments in the People Management on Sales adviser who gave personal number to customers and waited five months for disciplinary hearing was unfairly dismissed, tribunal rules.
- 28 November 2022
- Corporate and M&A
2023: Investment & Acquisition Opportunities in the Chaos?
2023 is looking like it will be a tough year, but some adaptable entrepreneurs and businesses are viewing the current economic climate as an opportunity. Planning strategic investments in the business and assets of distressed companies. Often these businesses have the potential to thrive but have been affected by circumstances outside their control.
- 23 November 2022
- Privacy and Data Protection
Latest developments in UK data protection and cybersecurity
The UK data protection landscape has been everchanging particularly since the Government’s announcement to reform its data protection legislation following Brexit through the Data Protection and Digital Information Bill, and the updated process on international data transfers.
- 22 November 2022
Imposing new terms on employees: the Twitter dilemma?
Twitter has made headlines yet again after its new owner, Elon Musk, has given employees an ultimatum: work long hours at high intensity, or quit and receive 3 months’ severance pay. Employees were given until Thursday 17 November 2022 to make a decision, which was around 24 hours after the ultimatum was given.