Search

How can we help?

Icon

Court rules that ignoring employee’s greeting contributed to a breach of trust and confidence

Ignoring an employee’s “hello” may seem trivial but it can have significant consequences!  Showing you are annoyed with a member of staff in this way is unprofessional and can backfire as the case below reveals.

In a recent ruling, an Employment Tribunal held that an employer had contributed to the breakdown of the trust and confidence with their employee by failing to respond to the employee’s greeting.

Hanson (the “claimant”), had worked for her employer, (the “company”), as an Operations Manager in September 2023 after her previous employer was acquired by the company. Later that month, the claimant had arrived late to work due to a medical appointment. On arrival the claimant attempted to greet the company’s managing director and said hello to him three separate times, but the director refused to reply. The director had mistakenly thought that the claimant was late to work and he was not aware of her pre-approved medical appointment.  The director later called the claimant into a meeting where he dismissed the claimant’s attempt to show  proof of her medical appointment and suggested that she leaves. Following the meeting the director contacted two employees who report to the claimant, telling them that they would be receiving a pay rise without previously informing her.

The claimant resigned from her role in October 2023, as she felt undervalued by the company and was signed off work due to anxiety caused by her treatment. During the claimant’s absence, the director refused to pay sick leave and inferred that he did not believe that the claimant was genuinely unwell. The claimant brought a claim of unfair dismissal and a claim of unauthorised deduction from wages against the company, which were both successful.

The claimant brought a claim of unfair dismissal and a claim of unauthorised deduction from wages against the company, which were both successful.

The Tribunal held that the director had “already formed the view” that the claimant did not adequately perform her role and was relying on her colleagues, without having a discussion or conversation with the claimant to find out what work she actually did. The employer’s conduct was held to be “calculated or likely to destroy or seriously damage the trust and confidence between the claimant and [the employer]”.

The court’s ruling serves as an important reminder on how employers should treat their employees. If an employer does not have proper or reasonable cause, they should not make any assumptions which would impact how an employee is treated. How a manager views their employees will be crucial in any employment relationship and employers should ensure that they do not conduct themselves in a manner that is likely to undermine trust and confidence with their employees.

In this case, the court considered the fact that these events had taken place in a relatively short timescale and found that the director had made a “snap judgement” which was reflected in his later conduct. Employers should, therefore, take care and ensure that staff, particularly management, are effectively trained in order to reduce any risk of snap decisions or inappropriate behaviour which could potentially lead to long term issues for the company.

If you want advice on how to navigate your employee relationships, work place dynamics or how to balance the needs of your employees please get in touch with our employment team who will be more than happy to assist.

 

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 24 June 2026
  • Employment

What are employer’s obligations during a heatwave?

During the summer, employers can come across employee issues relating to the heat and hot weather. How can employers handle hot weather and what are employer obligations during a heatwave?

art
  • 23 June 2026
  • Employment

Pride month and employment law: Ensuring compliance with LGBTQ+ protections

With each Pride month, companies unveil rainbow logos and send office wide emails of solidarity. These gestures are valuable, giving visible demonstrations of support, but only really make a difference if those companies are able to truly say that their policies and practices are inclusive and legally compliant.

Pub
  • 18 June 2026
  • Employment

Employment Rights Act 2025: Key Changes for Employers

Join Katie Glendinning and Lucy White for an on demand webinar as they break down the key changes introduced by the Employment Rights Act 2025, offering clear insights into what these reforms mean in practice for employers and HR professionals.

art
  • 16 June 2026
  • Employment

Shaping the Future of Work: Insights from the 114th ILO International Labour Conference

Having recently returned from the 114th Session of the International Labour Conference in Geneva, I have been reflecting on the work of the International Labour Organisation (ILO) and the important role it plays in global standard setting, as well as promoting social and economic inclusivity.

art
  • 03 June 2026
  • Employment

Holiday Pay Record Keeping – What this new duty means for employers

The Employment Rights Act 2025 made certain changes to the rules around holiday records, which came into effect on 6th April 2026.

art
  • 20 May 2026
  • Employment

Trade Unions Right of Access from October – What you need to know

Under the Employment Rights Act 2025, independent Trade Unions (i.e. those with a certificate of independence) will have a right to access workplaces (physically and digitally) from October 2026.