- 03 June 2016
In the recent case of Globe Motors Inc v TRW Lucas Variety Electric Steering Ltd, the Court of Appeal held that a contractual clause requiring variations to be in writing did not prevent a variation being agreed by a different method i.e. verbally or by conduct.
The case involved a long term supply agreement which contained a clause specifying that any variation of its terms was to be in writing and signed by the parties. Although not the main issue in question in this case, the Court of Appeal considered the validity of this clause. It recognised that the overriding principle of freedom of contract means that parties are free to include terms regulating the manner in which the contract can be varied, however, it could find no principled basis on which to restrict the manner of a contract variation. It ultimately found that parties are free to vary the contract by a different method if they so wish despite the presence of a clause to the contrary.
Chambers and Partners
The Clarkslegal team are commercial and good to work with. They get what our business needs and tell me what I need to hear.
Whilst this case was not brought in an employment context, its principles are nonetheless relevant to employers and the contracts they enter into. However, employers should not be downing drafting tools and ditching such clauses following this case! Firstly, the comments made by the Court of Appeal were obiter which means they are not binding, although they give a good indication of how courts may interpret such clauses. Secondly, from a practical perspective, it remains important for parties to clearly set their preferences for variations and, obviously, written variations will be much easier to evidence should there be a dispute. Finally, in the event that an employer is accused of varying an agreement verbally or by its conduct, the presence of such a clause may still assist it in demonstrating that no variation was agreed. Therefore, the message from this case is really for parties to be wary of inadvertently agreeing variations to contracts in the mistaken belief that changes can only be in writing, rather than any message to alter their drafting in this regard.
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.
About this article
SubjectContractual variations: to write or not to write?
Published03 June 2016
Read, listen and watch our latest insights
- 08 December 2023
UK Hospitality – Right to Work
The UK’s hospitality sector is strongly impacted by immigration rules and policies post-Brexit.
- 04 December 2023
- Commercial Real Estate
Real Estate update and 2024 expectations
The ECC confers rights on code operators to install and maintain electronic communications apparatus on public land, and even grants operators the right to sometimes apply to court for an order allowing them to install and maintain such apparatus on private land.
- 29 November 2023
How will the Autumn Statement 2023 affect the Construction Industry?
On 22 November 2023 Parliament was presented with the Chancellor’s Autumn Statement.
- 29 November 2023
- Public Procurement
Public Procurement Annual Update 2023
Watch Clarkslegal’s Public Procurement team as they provide you with the essential information businesses involved in public tenders need to know.
- 28 November 2023
The risk of insolvency with equal pay claims: how can you avoid them?
Even though the law states that everyone should be paid equally for work of comparable value, this does not always happen in practice.
- 21 November 2023
- Privacy and Data Protection
Privacy matters: How the 8 data subject rights protect personal data
In this guide we explore the 8 data subject rights under the UK GDPR and discover how they play a vital role in preserving your organisation’s privacy standards in an increasingly interconnected world.