Search

How can we help?

Icon

Confidentiality agreements guidance

Non disclosure agreements (NDAs) have long been a popular subject in the media. Seeking to clarify its position on their use in employment matters, the Equality and Human Rights Commission has issued new guidance. 

The purpose of the guidance is to clarify the law on confidentiality agreements in employment scenarios, with particular emphasis on improving understanding and transparency when combating discrimination in the workplace. Whilst not statutory guidance, this is still highly useful for employers and employees, given that new legislation that will restrict the use of confidentiality clauses in NDAs is expected in the near future.

The guidance covers the use of confidentiality agreements between employers and all those who are protected by Equality Act 2010. Naturally, the guidance stresses how carefully the employers must scrutinise the wording of any such agreement.

Each agreement should be very clear about what the worker can or cannot do and, in particular, the agreement must not prevent the individual from speaking out about any form of discrimination. This ‘Good Practice’ section goes on to state that employers should not put their employees under any pressure to sign any confidentiality agreement. If they do, it may render the agreement unenforceable. It is recommended that employers go one step further and encourage their workers to take independent legal advice before signing any agreement.

The guidance covers the use of confidentiality agreements between employers and all those who are protected by Equality Act 2010.

The guidance also touches on Settlement Agreements and COT3s, stating that every employer should be wary of treating these agreements as the end of the matter. Instead the guidance advises that any discrimination matters that may be raised by the other party to the Settlement Agreement or COT3 should still be investigated if the employer is to truly avail itself of the ‘reasonable steps’ defence in any potential future claim.

Read the full guidance

For further information contact our experienced employment lawyers.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 15 September 2025
  • Immigration

Sharp rise in Sponsor Licence Revocations – What employers need to know

The Home Office has reported a record number of sponsor licence revocations over the past year, as part of its intensified efforts to crack down on abuse of the UK’s immigration system.

art
  • 10 September 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

Trouble at the Table: The Challenges Facing the UK Hospitality Sector in the run up to Christmas 2025

The UK hospitality sector, long celebrated for its vibrancy and resilience, is facing a perfect storm of economic, operational, and structural challenges in 2025.

art
  • 09 September 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

Le bail commercial anglais: quelques points essentiels à considérer

Typiquement, les baux commerciaux en Angleterre sont de court terme, d’une durée de 5 ou 10 ans, avec un loyer de marché et des ajustements du loyer périodiques en fonction de l’inflation ou d’autres facteurs. 

art
  • 09 September 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

The Failure to Prevent Fraud Offence – be prepared to avoid criminal liability

The failure to prevent fraud offence is a new corporate offence which has come into force on 1 September 2025.

art
  • 08 September 2025
  • Employment

Can employers still make changes to contracts after the Employment Rights Bill?

The short answer is yes but it will be much more difficult for employers following the introduction of the Employment Rights Bill because their ability to fairly dismiss employees who do not agree contractual changes is being restricted. 

art
  • 05 September 2025
  • Privacy and Data Protection

When Ignoring a DSAR Becomes a Criminal Offence

On 3 September 2025, Mr Jason Blake appeared at Beverley Magistrates Court and was fined for failing to respond to a data subject access request (DSAR).