Search

How can we help?

Icon

Named and shamed: Complying with the National Minimum Wage

Approximately 208 employers have been named and shamed by the Government in December 2021 for failing to pay their employees the minimum wage.

Between them, the employers had underpaid approx. 12,000 workers by around £1.2 million. The workers had been underpaid in different ways, including having deductions that reduced pay (such as complying with the dress code), not paying all working time (e.g. trial shifts), or failing to apply the correct rates.

By not complying with national minimum wage laws, the employers had to pay the workers what was owed, and paid financial penalties to HMRC.

So how can issues with non-compliance be avoided?

What is the minimum wage? 

The National Minimum Wage (NMW) is the minimum hourly rate of pay set by the Government each year. The rates apply from 6 April each year.

The current and new rates are as follows:

Current NMW Rates  New Rates from 6 April 2022 

23 and older

(National Living Wage)

£8.91

£9.50

21 – 22 years old

£8.36

£9.18

18 – 20 years old

£6.56

£6.83

16 – 17 years old

£4.62

£4.81

Apprentices

£4.30

£4.81

 

 There is a difference between the National Living Wage (23 and older) and the Real Living Wage – the former is set by the Government and is compulsory, with the latter set by the Real Living Wage Foundation and compliance with it is voluntary.

Who is entitled to National Minimum Wage?

The above NMW rates apply to both employees and workers over the compulsory school age, with few exceptions for very specific categories of workers.

How is it assessed?

Compliance with the NMW is assessed by looking at:

  • The worker’s pay reference period (typically one month),
  • Their total gross pay (including salary, bonuses, commission),
  • Any payments or deductions that affect pay for NMW purposes (e.g. deductions for uniform or tools),
  • Their working time.

To find the worker’s hourly rate for NMW purposes, the worker’s total pay (gross pay less any deductions) in the pay reference period is divided by the total number of hours worked in that period.

Once the hourly rate has been calculated, it is then compared with the relevant NMW rate for that worker.

By not complying with national minimum wage laws, the employers had to pay the workers what was owed, and paid financial penalties to HMRC.

Consequences for non-compliance 

Enforcement of NMW rates can be done either via HMRC or the worker themselves. HMRC enforce legislation on behalf of BEIS, and can serve a notice of underpayment, which will set out the arrears that need to be repaid by the employer and can include a financial penalty for the employer to pay to HMRC. This penalty is 200% of the underpayment, up to a maximum of £20,000, but is reduced to 50% of the unpayment if paid within 14 days.

Employers can also be named on a public list, and civil proceedings can be issued if the above remains unpaid.

The worker can also enforce the NMW rates, by making a claim in the Employment Tribunal for an unlawful deduction from wages or for breach of contract.

Further information

If you need any advice on the national minimum wage, please contact a member of our Employment Team.

Our employment law team work alongside clients, as trusted partners navigating the best course of action. We can offer a reassuring hand to help navigate the employment regulations and guide you to the right solution. Find out more about our employment services.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 26 October 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Shareholders’ Agreements for Founders and Investors – SHA Series Part 3 of 5

A shareholders’ agreement is arguably one of the most valuable corporate governance agreements (along with articles of association) in any private UK company with more than one shareholder.

art
  • 23 October 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Section 172 Companies Act 2006: Key lessons from Saxon Woods v Costa

The Supreme Court’s decision in Saxon Woods v Costa UKSC 21 clarifies directors’ duties under Section 172 Companies Act 2006, confirming that good faith requires both honest belief and appropriate conduct.

art
  • 19 October 2026
  • Immigration

Right to Work Checks: Are UK businesses becoming immigration enforcement officers?

The UK’s Right to Work regime has undergone a significant expansion, with changes taking effect from 1 October 2026.

art
  • 15 October 2026

Clarkslegal celebrates continued success in Chambers and Partners UK 2027

Clarkslegal is delighted to announce that we have once again been recognised by Chambers and Partners UK 2027, celebrating continued success across the firm and a number of enhanced individual rankings.

Pub
  • 15 October 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Data breaches and ICO investigations: Responding with confidence

In this podcast Harry Berryman and Zahra Navarro discuss recent ICO enforcement action, common causes of data breaches, and the practical steps organisations should take to respond effectively when incidents occur.

art
  • 14 October 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

London Court of International Arbitration v International Chamber of Commerce: Key differences

Compare LCIA and ICC arbitration rules, costs, confidentiality provisions and expedited procedures. Learn the key differences between these leading international arbitration institutions and how to choose the right option for your commercial dispute.