Search

How can we help?

Icon

If you don’t get it right the first time…comply, comply, comply!

Byron has recently been in the news following arrests by the Home Office of 35 of its workers from Albania, Nepal, Brazil and Egypt. The arrests were made at the burger chain on 4 July with Byron’s ‘full co-operation’ according to the Home Office. Interestingly, the arrests have caused quite a stir on social media, with campaigns for the chain to be boycotted following reports that training sessions were allegedly set up to lure workers to a single location for their arrest.

Byron has been hailed by the Home Office for its full compliance with ‘immigration and asylum law in its employment practices’. It was not disputed that the chain had conducted the correct ‘right to work’ checks on recruits, rather that the employees had provided false documents. The Home Office has since confirmed that as a result of their full compliance, the chain would not face any legal action.

Companies need to be vigilant in conducting their ‘right to work’ checks. A checklist for employers can be downloaded here.

The recent passage of the Immigration Act 2016, which has strengthened the offence of illegal working, demonstrates the Government’s tough attitude towards illegal working. Now more than ever employers need to exercise a great deal of caution in conducting their ‘right to work’ checks to avoid falling foul of the law. The important message to take from Bryon is that where those checks fail, employers should fully comply with the Home Office to avoid legal action. However, full compliance may still not escape the consequences of negative publicity and social media attention.

Our expert immigration lawyers can support you with conducting right to work checks and complying with UK immigration law. For further assistance please contact our team immigration@clarkslegal.com

Employmentbuddy.com 

Monica Atwal

Managing Partner

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

Chambers and Partners

The Clarkslegal team are commercial and good to work with. They get what our business needs and tell me what I need to hear.

About this article

Disclaimer

This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Monica Atwal

Managing Partner

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 09 December 2024
  • Corporate and M&A

UK Directors’ Responsibilities

On becoming a director of a company, directors undertake to comply with various duties and responsibilities. which are specified in the Companies Act 2006. In this article, we will explain how you can comply with these practical responsibilities.

art
  • 09 December 2024
  • Commercial Real Estate

What happens to a sublease when the headlease is surrendered, forfeited or disclaimed?

The intermediate tenant under the headlease falls away and the tenant under the sublease becomes the direct tenant of the superior landlord.

art
  • 09 December 2024
  • Employment

Mistletoe and Missteps: Preventing Harassment at Christmas Parties

As the festive season approaches, offices are coming together for their annual Christmas parties, offering a chance to unwind and celebrate the year’s achievements. However, whilst these events provide a necessary release and recognition of employee’s contributions, they also present a heightened risk of inappropriate behaviour, particularly sexual harassment.

art
  • 03 December 2024
  • Immigration

UPDATE – Ministers to postpone full eVisa rollout amid fears of UK residents being stranded abroad

The UK government will postpone the full transition to eVisas, initially planned for 1 January 2025, following concerns that system glitches could leave UK residents stranded abroad.

art
  • 02 December 2024
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

The Era of AI

In this recent case, the First-Tier Tribunal gave a stark warning to litigants about use of AI in litigation.

art
  • 28 November 2024
  • Employment

Employment Rights Bill: The Regulatory Policy Committee opinion

This article considers the Regulatory Policy Committee’s recently published opinion on the impact assessments for the Employment Rights Bill. The Committee assessed the quality of evidence and analysis used to inform the government proposals and came to the overall opinion that the impact assessments are currently “not fit for purpose”.