Search

How can we help?

Icon

Right to work – powers to close business premises for non-compliance

We recently blogged about parts of the Immigration Act 2016 which came into force on 12 July 2016 extending criminal offences for employers in relation to illegal working. These sections of the Act also empower immigration officers to search and seize documents in connection with the imposition of a civil penalty where they have reasonable grounds to believe an employer is in breach of their duties to prevent illegal working.

Businesses should also be aware that in certain circumstances, if immigration officers have reasonable grounds to believe an employer is flouting the law, they could issue an “illegal working closure notice” for up to 48 hours enabling them to close the whole business until they have carried out a full investigation. Employers will be prohibited from accessing their premises and the business will be unable to trade for the duration of the closure.

In addition, if the immigration officers require more time to investigate, an application for a compliance order can be made to the court extending the 48-hour time period to anything up to 12 months. The Act gives significant powers to the courts to make orders they feel necessary to ensure businesses are prevented from trading until they are able to demonstrate they are fully compliant with immigration laws.

Home Office statistics from last month reveal that in the financial year 2015/16, Immigration Enforcement issued 2,594 civil penalties to businesses found to be employing illegal workers. Following the introduction of these new provisions, there is no doubt that more employers will be penalised so it’s imperative that employers are aware of these new changes and ensure they’re fully compliant.

 

“illegal working closure notice”

Our immigration team regularly advises businesses on how to carry out right to work checks and on compliance issues.  We have also successfully challenged the Home Office’s civil penalty notices in cases where employers are able to demonstrate they have complied with immigration laws.

Employmentbuddy.com

Disclaimer

This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

Monica Atwal

Managing Partner

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 07 August 2026
  • Employment

ACAS Draft New Code on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures

ACAS have published a draft Code on 30 July 2026, which will replace the 2015 ACAS Code on disciplinary and grievance procedures when the Code is finalised at the end of September 2026.

art
  • 06 August 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

The rise of the AI-powered individual: Is your business ready?

Artificial intelligence is changing the data protection landscape, but perhaps not in the way many organisations expected. Much of the discussion has centred on businesses adopting AI and ensuring they comply with the UK GDPR.

Pub
  • 06 August 2026
  • Employment

Employment law changes in 2026: What you need to know

With ongoing changes to UK employment law, staying updated is more challenging than ever. Join Monica Atwal and Harry Berryman for a live webinar covering 2026 HR changes and key employment law updates on Thursday 17 September.

Pub
  • 04 August 2026
  • Employment

From Opportunity to Employment: Building Inclusive Workplaces Together | Hosted by Breakthrough Supported Employment

Join Breakthrough Supported Employment for a live seminar on building inclusive workplaces at Malmaison Reading. Clarkslegal’s Lucy White will speak alongside industry experts, sharing insights on fostering diversity and creating equitable opportunities.

art
  • 04 August 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Advantages of arbitration over litigation

Arbitration is a method of resolving disputes outside the court system, with the dispute being determined by an independent arbitrator or tribunal rather than a judge. Whether a dispute is best resolved through arbitration or litigation will ultimately depend on the particular facts and circumstances of the case.

art
  • 04 August 2026
  • Immigration

Home Office revokes EU Settlement Scheme Status ‘Granted in Error’ – What does This Mean for EU Citizens?

Recent reports that the Home Office has begun revoking the immigration status of some EU nationals on the basis that it was originally “granted in error” have caused understandable concern among immigration practitioners and those with status under the EU Settlement Scheme (EUSS).