Search

How can we help?

Icon

Right to work – powers to close business premises for non-compliance

We recently blogged about parts of the Immigration Act 2016 which came into force on 12 July 2016 extending criminal offences for employers in relation to illegal working. These sections of the Act also empower immigration officers to search and seize documents in connection with the imposition of a civil penalty where they have reasonable grounds to believe an employer is in breach of their duties to prevent illegal working.

Businesses should also be aware that in certain circumstances, if immigration officers have reasonable grounds to believe an employer is flouting the law, they could issue an “illegal working closure notice” for up to 48 hours enabling them to close the whole business until they have carried out a full investigation. Employers will be prohibited from accessing their premises and the business will be unable to trade for the duration of the closure.

In addition, if the immigration officers require more time to investigate, an application for a compliance order can be made to the court extending the 48-hour time period to anything up to 12 months. The Act gives significant powers to the courts to make orders they feel necessary to ensure businesses are prevented from trading until they are able to demonstrate they are fully compliant with immigration laws.

Home Office statistics from last month reveal that in the financial year 2015/16, Immigration Enforcement issued 2,594 civil penalties to businesses found to be employing illegal workers. Following the introduction of these new provisions, there is no doubt that more employers will be penalised so it’s imperative that employers are aware of these new changes and ensure they’re fully compliant.

 

“illegal working closure notice”

Our immigration team regularly advises businesses on how to carry out right to work checks and on compliance issues.  We have also successfully challenged the Home Office’s civil penalty notices in cases where employers are able to demonstrate they have complied with immigration laws.

Employmentbuddy.com

Disclaimer

This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

Monica Atwal

Managing Partner

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 16 March 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Shareholder Disputes: Managing Shareholder Buyouts and Exits – Episode 3

Join Stuart Mullins and Nicky Goringe Larkin for the third and final episode of our Shareholder Disputes series, where we move from prevention to resolution—exploring what happens when a founder’s exit becomes unavoidable.

art
  • 13 March 2026
  • Employment

When Immigration compliance becomes discrimination: The UK’s uncomfortable workplace balance

UK employers today operate under powerful, and some may say conflicting, legal pressures. On one hand, they must prevent illegal working under UK immigration laws.

art
  • 09 March 2026
  • Commercial Real Estate

Commercial Rent Deposits – A brief overview

A rent deposit is money provided by a tenant to its landlord as security for payment of the rent and performance of the tenant’s covenants contained in the lease.

art
  • 03 March 2026
  • Employment

International Women’s Day 2026 – Supporting equality and inclusion for a better, happier workforce

This year, International Women’s Day is inviting everyone to think differently about equality and how it can benefit everyone. The theme this year is ‘Give to Gain’.

art
  • 02 March 2026
  • Employment

10 facts an employer should know about holding personal data

Personal data is any information that can be used to identify an employee.

art
  • 27 February 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

How (not!) to serve a winding up petition on a company using a default address

This case concerned an appeal by DG Resources Ltd (“DG”) on the basis that a winding up petition brought by HMRC (the “Petition”) was invalidly served.