Search

How can we help?

Icon

Challenging a procurement award: what are the possible outcomes?

Losing a tender is never a welcome experience, especially when significant time and money has been expended on preparing your bid. In some cases, there may be good reasons to challenge the outcome legally. But what are the possible outcomes of challenging the award of a public contract?

The legal remedies available under the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (the “Regulations”) depend on whether the public body has yet entered into the contract with the winning bidder or not:

If the contract has not yet been entered into, the court can order …

  1. That a document be amended or corrected eg. that criteria in the Invitation to Tender documents which breach procurement law must be amended, or mathematical errors in the evaluation documents must be corrected.
  2. That a decision made by a public body be set aside eg. a decision to award the contract to a particular bidder, or a decision to disqualify a particular bidder.
  3. That the public body should pay the unsuccessful bidder damages. Damages are usually based on the loss of profits the unsuccessful bidder would have made on the contract. In light of recent case law, damages may only be available to bidders if the breach of the Regulations the public body has committed is sufficiently serious.

If the public body has already entered into the contract with the winning bidder, the court can order …

  1. Damages, on the same basis as above.
  2. Where there has been a very serious procedural breach of the Regulations, that a contract is declared ineffective. brought to an end and treated as if it never existed. Declarations of ineffectiveness are very rarely available.

The legal remedies available under the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (the “Regulations”) depend on whether the public body has yet entered into the contract with the winning bidder or not

There are also some possible outcomes not catered for in the Regulations …

  1. The public body may decide to abandon the tender. In almost all cases the Invitation to Tender documents will reserve the right for the public body to abandon a tender and will not oblige the public body to enter into a contract with the winning bidder.
  2. The public body may be ordered to enter into a contract with you, the unsuccessful bidder who ought to have won, had there not been a breach of the Regulations. This is not a remedy provided for in the Regulations, but the court does have a general equitable power outside of the Regulations to grant injunctions forcing a party to do something. However, in a procurement case this power will only be exercised in exceptional circumstances.

It is important for bidders embarking upon a procurement challenge to consider the available remedies and decide whether winning the contract is vital to them, or whether they would be content with a financial remedy. This will inform the action to be taken and the deadlines to be met.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 22 December 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

Corporate law in 2025 and looking forward to 2026

2025 has been a transformative year, with a massive paradigm shift from ‘deregulation’ to ‘transparency and accountability’ at Companies House.

Pub
  • 22 December 2025
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Data Protection Audits: Launch Event

Join us for a breakfast networking session on Thursday 5th February 2026 as we officially launch our Data Protection Audit services.

Pub
  • 22 December 2025
  • Privacy and Data Protection

GDPR Packages

Our comprehensive GDPR Packages are designed to help organisations navigate the complexities of data protection and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements.

art
  • 18 December 2025
  • Employment

Employment Law: Looking back at 2025 and what to expect in 2026

2025 has certainly been an interesting year for employment law. While the Employment Rights Bill has pulled much of the focus since it was introduced in October 2024, there have been other important updates this year as well.

art
  • 18 December 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

Deal Announcement: Clarkslegal’s corporate lawyers advise on the sale of Chatterbox Labs Limited to subsidiary of American tech giant

Clarkslegal’s corporate team, led by Senior Consultant Jon Chapman and supported by Senior Solicitor Emma Docking, advised the founders of Chatterbox Labs Limited on the sale of the AI security specialist to Red Hat, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of IBM.

art
  • 16 December 2025
  • Employment

Christmas Parties – Festive Fun or a New Year Hangover?

It’s Christmas party season! The office party is often a mixed blessing – an opportunity to boost morale and perhaps celebrate a successful year yet also a melting pot of workers letting their hair down, with potential for accidents, injuries, threats and claims.