Search

How can we help?

Icon

Battle of the rights – Landlord’s right to build vs the tenant’s right to quiet enjoyment

It is commonplace for a landlord who fully owns a commercial property to part rent it out and then to reserve a right in the lease enabling them to develop the remainder of the property. However, would the landlord be completely free to do so?

This question was answered in Timothy Taylor Ltd v Mayfair House Corporation [2016] EWHC 1075 which reminded landlords to be cautious not to categorically assume an unchallengeable right to develop the remainder of a building without taking into account the concerns of existing tenants.

The tenant operated a high class art gallery from the ground floor and basement of a five storey building in Mayfair, London. The lease contained clauses entitling the landlord to carry out development works to other parts of the building, and in particular to erect scaffolding. Against this, the lease also contained a clause permitting the tenant to peaceably and quietly enjoy the premises.

When the landlord began works to develop the upper floors of the building in 2013, the works produced high levels of noise and the scaffolding enveloped the whole building. This rendered the gallery virtually invisible, giving the impression that it was closed and formed part of the building site. This soon led to a claim from the tenant against the landlord.

There was an acute conflict between the landlord’s and the tenant’s respective rights under the lease. The Court found that despite the landlord’s express right to redevelop adjoining premises under the terms of the lease, with some disruption, the manner in which the landlord had been undertaking its redevelopment works exceeded this right and was in breach of the covenant for quiet enjoyment.

In particular, the Court found that the design of the landlord’s scaffolding and its failure to consult or provide sufficient information to enable to gallery to plan around the noise were unreasonable.

The judge took particular note of the quality of the premises and their location and the high rent payable and the fact that the landlord was undertaking the works for its own benefit rather than simply seeking to comply with any repairing obligation or other duty to the tenant.

In particular, the Court found that the design of the landlord’s scaffolding and its failure to consult or provide sufficient information to enable to gallery to plan around the noise were unreasonable.

This decision highlights some practical points and factors that a landlord should consider when taking reasonable steps to minimise disturbance to a tenant. A landlord should:

  • Give the tenant as much information as possible about any proposed works before the lease is granted; Meet with the tenant at an early stage to explain the works and discuss how disturbances can be minimised including noise limits and quiet periods;
  • Ensure that any specific requirements agreed between the Landlord and tenant are passed on to, and implemented by, the contractor and project managers – including regular meetings with the tenant;
  • Design the scaffolding and make delivery and unloading arrangements that do not obstruct any access points of the tenant’s premises and try to ensure that signage is kept visible; and
  • Ensure that the tenant is kept updated as to the length of the works and any conditions in the lease relating to the right to carry out works are complied with.

For further information on landlord/tenant rights, please contact our Real Estate legal team.

Disclaimer

This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 24 March 2026
  • Immigration

Spouse Visa – Is your relationship genuine and subsisting?

For years many couples have become frustrated by the requirements for a spouse visa as the rules and guidance are difficult to understand. A significant amount of applications are rejected on the basis of the applicant not providing the adequate documents to evidence the relationship requirement.

art
  • 20 March 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Drag-Along & Tag-Along Rights: Why Every Company Needs Them

When starting a company, very few founders are aware of the potential issues around shares, share ownership and the implications of that when selling their company.

art
  • 19 March 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

WhatsApp in the Workplace

This article explores the potential risks of using WhatsApp for workplace communications, the implications for GDPR compliance and under UK legislation, and provides practical tips for employers to mitigate these risks.

art
  • 16 March 2026
  • Employment

Trade Union Law Changes from April 2026

April brings the next tranche of reforms under the Employment Rights Act 2025 including changes to the statutory recognition scheme making it easier for trade unions to be recognised in the workplace.

Pub
  • 16 March 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Shareholder Disputes: Managing Shareholder Buyouts and Exits – Episode 3

Join Stuart Mullins and Nicky Goringe Larkin for the third and final episode of our Shareholder Disputes series, where we move from prevention to resolution—exploring what happens when a founder’s exit becomes unavoidable.

art
  • 13 March 2026
  • Employment

When Immigration compliance becomes discrimination: The UK’s uncomfortable workplace balance

UK employers today operate under powerful, and some may say conflicting, legal pressures. On one hand, they must prevent illegal working under UK immigration laws.