Search

How can we help?

Icon

Taking steps to avoid or reduce the impact of discrimination

When a discrimination claim is successful, as well as being able to order compensation for injury to feelings and financial losses, employment tribunals have the power to make a recommendation that, within a specified period, the employer take specific steps to avoid or reduce the impact of the discrimination. A common example is a recommendation that the employer provide an agreed reference.

Tribunals should not usually recommend that a victim of discrimination should have their pay increased or that they should be awarded a new contract because losses arising from discrimination should be dealt with by way of compensation.

This has led many businesses, when faced with a discrimination claim, to think that recommendations do not have a direct financial consequence. However, as the case of Hill v Lloyds Bank shows, this is not accurate.

In this case, the Employment Appeal Tribunal decided that a recommendation can include making an employer undertake to pay a redundancy payment to someone who is not redundant.

The claimant, in this case suffered with depression, allegedly caused by bullying and harassment by two colleagues. When she returned from sick leave, she asked her employer to guarantee that either she would not be required to work with them or that she would receive severance equivalent to an enhanced redundancy payment.

The employer did not give this guarantee and the claimant brought a claim for disability discrimination on the basis that this was a failure to make reasonable adjustments.

The tribunal and the EAT agreed that the employer’s practice was not to give such promises and this had put the claimant at a substantial disadvantage compared to a non-disabled person because it caused her anxiety and fear. The finding was that giving the claimant the guarantee she had requested would have reduced that fear and it would have been reasonable for the employer to do so.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal decided that a recommendation can include making an employer undertake to pay a redundancy payment to someone who is not redundant.

There were issues with the recommendation and the matter has been remitted back to the Tribunal to consider.  However, the EAT held that, as a matter of principle, the law did not prevent the tribunal from making a recommendation requiring the employer to give such a written undertaking.

For advice on the full ramifications of allegations of discrimination at work, contact our discrimination lawyers.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 08 May 2025
  • Employment

Statutory Sick Pay Scheme changes: how can employers prepare for such changes?

The government has recently changed the Statutory Sick Pay provisions; it is anticipated that such changes will ‘help people to stay in work and grow the economy’.

Pub
  • 07 May 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

Thinking of exiting your business? Part 1

In the first part of this three-part series, we explore why planning your exit strategy early can shape the way you build, grow, and eventually sell your business for maximum value. From mindset to strategy, we unpack how thinking about the end from the beginning can lead to smarter decisions and better outcomes.

Pub
  • 07 May 2025
  • Immigration

UK Immigration: Essential update for employers

The UK’s immigration system will see major changes in 2025. Watch our UK immigration specialists, Ruth Karimatsenga and Monica Mastropasqua, as they explore the key updates and how they affect your business.

art
  • 06 May 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

Can a disclosure letter give rise to a misrepresentation claim?

Provided by a seller to a buyer, a disclosure letter is an important element in any business sale or purchase transaction.

art
  • 02 May 2025
  • Employment

Sex, Gender and the Law: What the Supreme Court’s Recent Ruling Means for Employers

The recent UK Supreme Court decision in For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers  UKSC 16 has generated significant attention, but for most employers, we would argue that its practical impact is relatively limited—at least for now.

art
  • 29 April 2025
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Use of Personal Devices at Work: Why a Bring Your Own Device Policy is Essential

We will highlight in this article what changes have been made to the DUAB since the early stages of the Bill.