Search

How can we help?

Icon

Changing reasonable adjustments could be discriminatory

Employers should be aware that changing or removing adjustments for a disabled employee could amount to a failure to make reasonable adjustments, even if they are replaced with other adjustments.

In Northumberland Tyne & Wear NHS Foundation Trust v D Ward (2019), the claimant had chronic fatigue syndrome. As a result of this disability, she was more likely to have higher absences than other employees. The trust amended the application of its sickness and absence policy in her case so that the threshold for triggering disciplinary action was increased to five periods of absence in 12 months, rather than three. During the four years that this extension was in place, the claimant avoided triggering disciplinary action. However, when the extension was removed and the standard policy applied to her instead, the claimant’s absences resulted in disciplinary action and ultimately dismissal.

The claimant had chronic fatigue syndrome.

When the Trust removed the extension, it did introduce other adjustments to the claimant’s workload and hours instead. However, the EAT found that the Tribunal had been entitled to conclude that there had been a failure to make reasonable adjustments because the new measures had not ameliorated the disadvantage faced by the claimant, or only did so to a limited extent. The Trust had failed in its duty by not providing the reasonable adjustment that was actually capable of ameliorating the disadvantage – the extension to the policy

This leaves employers in a challenging position. An adjustment that is considered reasonable at a particular point in time cannot automatically be treated as reasonable indefinitely, but this case shows that any changes will need to be well thought through – particularly where the adjustment appears to be working well from the perspective of the disabled employee. If an employer needs to make alternative arrangements, it should be on the basis that the previous adjustments have genuinely ceased to be reasonable and any new adjustments are just as effective.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

Caroline Lendrum

Associate

View profile

+44 118 960 4669

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 28 October 2025
  • Immigration

Supplementary Employment: When is it Allowed under UK Immigration Rules?

This article provides a guidance to understanding the rules on supplementary employment in the UK.

art
  • 24 October 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

Navigating the building regulations regime in commercial property transactions

Building control is said to be one of the earliest forms of local government in England, with the modern building regulations progressing in the aftermath of the Great Fire of London.

art
  • 23 October 2025
  • Employment Rights Bill

Government launches Employment Rights Bill consultations – key changes employers need to know

The Employment Rights Bill is a draft law set to significantly expand workers’ rights. The Government has now launched the first round of consultations.

art
  • 23 October 2025
  • Privacy and Data Protection

AI and Data Protection – Is Fair and Transparent Privacy Possible?

We live in a digital world. Every facet of daily life is governed to some degree by phone, web or some form of connected technology.

art
  • 16 October 2025

Chambers and Partners 2026: Clarkslegal’s continued commitment to excellence

Clarkslegal is delighted to announce that we have once again been recognised by Chambers and Partners as a leading firm in their 2026 guide.

art
  • 15 October 2025
  • Immigration

Registering a child as a British Citizen: A guide to section 3(1) applications

This article explains the process of registering a child as a British citizen under section 3(1), including the eligibility criteria, the Home Office approach, and key factors that influence whether an application is approved.