Search

How can we help?

Icon

Had Enough? Winding your Business Down through the use of an MVL

The coronavirus pandemic has forced businesses to consider the way they operate and, in some instances, consider whether they have the ability to operate at all. Similarly, there will be many business owners who feel the risk of further pandemics in the future or business fatigue from the recent stressful economic environment has provided them with the incentive they needed to formally close down their business whilst it is still solvent.

When in such a position, a Members’ Voluntary Liquidation, or MVL, should be considered. This arrangement is not to be confused with a Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation, or CVL; the latter being a decision by directors and shareholders to liquidate the company due to its inability to pay the monies owed to creditors.

What is the procedure?

For an MVL, the first step will be to cease trading and effectively completing the company’s business. Settling any financial obligations now will avoid the need to pay any statutory interest on unsettled creditor claims filed after the formal MVL process has begun. Interest on these claims, which include those owed to HMRC, is high at 8% on top of what the company already owes. The directors should then begin or at least consider beginning the processes of deregistering for any applicable taxes and filing their final accounts and returns.

Crucially, MVLs are only available to solvent companies and requires a sworn statement by the company’s directors confirming that:

  • The company is solvent;
  • It can pay all of its taxes;
  • It can pay all of its creditors; and
  • It can meet all of its contractual obligations.

It is a critical feature of an MVL that all creditors be paid in full. It is paramount therefore that the basis of the declaration referenced above, has come from a full inquiry into the company’s affairs. This has been known to include an assessment of both the prospective and contingent liabilities of which the directors are aware for a 12-month period beginning on the date of the start of the MVL process.

Once the above has been confirmed, the members (or shareholders) then pass a special resolution (i.e one that must get 75% of the vote) confirming the company is to be wound up. This should be done within five weeks of the declaration of insolvency or the company risks invalidating it. The company then appoints a qualified insolvency practitioner to take control of the business.

By control we mean that the directors’ powers cease, and it is now the liquidator’s function to manage the company’s assets and distribute these among the company’s creditors. Hopefully, there remains a surplus, this is then distributed to the members. Once these formalities are completed and HMRC has provided clearance, the company becomes dissolved and is removed from the register. It is worth noting here that even though the liquidator is appointed by the company itself, should they discover the company was not actually solvent when it began the MVL process, they remain obliged to report on the directors’ conduct – this can lead to director disqualification.

MVLs are only available to solvent companies and requires a sworn statement by the company’s directors

What are the benefits?

Firstly, an MVL enables the company to be bought to a clean and orderly conclusion and closure. They can be planned well in advance and then actioned as soon as the business feels it is ready to commit.

Secondly, because the company is solvent when it enters the MVL, the liquidator is likely to return the members’ company capital in full. Members should also see the benefit of receiving any surplus in a timely manner. Again, because the company was solvent to begin with and with no outstanding liabilities that can be time-consuming to resolve, MVL’s have been known to take 6 months to complete.

Finally, winding up your business using an MVL can lead to tax benefits or relief for the shareholders. In many circumstances, retained profits will be deemed capital and rather than income when distributed to shareholders. Where this is the case, they will be subject to the more favourable Capital Gains Tax rather than income tax.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 09 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

The Arbitration Act 2025 – Factsheet

This factsheet outlines the major reforms and key developments introduced by the Arbitration Act 2025, including updates on summary disposal, jurisdictional challenges, emergency arbitrators, arbitrator disclosure duties, and governing law in arbitration proceedings.

art
  • 09 July 2026
  • Immigration

Right to Work Checks are changing from 1 October 2026: Is your business ready?

The Home Office’s new rules, effective 1 October 2026, will overhaul right to work checks and raise the risk of civil penalties for UK businesses.

art
  • 08 July 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

ICO prosecutes employee under the Data Protection Act for forwarding client data to his personal email address

The issue of employees taking confidential business information or personal data when moving to a new employer remains a significant concern for businesses.

Pub
  • 07 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Accelerating arbitration: Expedited procedures and key changes in the new ICC Rules – Episode 2

In episode 2, Jack Hobbs (Clarkslegal) and Christopher Howitt (Three Stone) explore how the latest expedited and highly expedited procedures under the ICC Arbitration Rules 2026 are transforming the landscape of dispute resolution.

art
  • 07 July 2026
  • Employment

6 month unfair dismissal rights: What employers need to know

Under the new Employment Rights Act 2025 the minimum period of service required to qualify to bring a statutory claim for unfair dismissal has been reduced from 2 full years to 6 months from 1 January 2027 onwards.  

art
  • 02 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Litigation and Artificial Intelligence: Where are we now?

In the recent case of Cork and another v Smith, the High Court publicly admonished a law firm and two of its solicitors after they had produced and submitted two AI-generated letters to the court containing misleading and false information in relation to a block transfer application made under Rule 12.37 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016.