- 17 March 2016
Commercial contracts often include obligations carrying the qualification “as soon as reasonably practicable”. A case earlier this month has given some insight into how the courts will interpret and apply such obligations.
The 2008 financial crisis generated a significant amount of litigation, much of it about complicated financial products. One such case is Goldman Sachs –v- Videocon Global. The precise details of that dispute, involving a currency swap transaction are not important. The point of interest, however, is that the Court of Appeal had to consider the impact of a failure by one party to serve a statement setting out details of the calculation of certain charges “as soon as reasonably practicable”.
The paying party argued that, because the statement had not been provided as soon as reasonably practicable, the obligation to pay, which was dependent on the provision of the statement, had never arisen. The payee, on the other hand, argued that although the statement had indeed been delivered later than was “reasonably practicable” this did not invalidate the statement once it had eventually been delivered.
Chambers and Partners
The Clarkslegal team are commercial and good to work with. They get what our business needs and tell me what I need to hear.
The Court of Appeal agreed with the payee: even though it had failed to deliver the statement as soon as “reasonably practicable” that did not, in this case, invalidate the statement and the payor was still required to pay.
The usual health warning applies to this Judgment, in that the construction of the meaning of any commercial agreement will be particular to that agreement. There are, of course, also ways that a clause of this sort could be worded in order to give a real remedy to the payor if it was not complied with. However the case does provide an insight into how the courts will approach such provisions in commercial agreements and apply commercial common sense to these types of arguments.
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.
Read, listen and watch our latest insights
- 06 February 2023
Redundancy and settlement agreements – What you need to know
In this podcast Ciara Duggan and Sana Nahas members of the employment team at Clarkslegal will guide you through the tricky topic of redundancy and settlement agreements, covering what redundancy means for both employers and employees, as well as how settlement agreements work in practise.
- 01 February 2023
What to expect in construction in 2023
Recent years have brought a host of challenges for the construction industry but what we expect for 2023?
- 30 January 2023
Deborah Scales comments on ‘the proposed Mental Health First Aid Bill’
In People Management, Deborah Scales, Associate at Clarkslegal, discusses the reasons why people professionals would likely welcome a change in set law as a “relatively swift and cost-effective” way to help the workplace.
- 26 January 2023
- Privacy and Data Protection
UK Data Protection: Development round-up 2022 and 2023 trends
In this podcast Oscar Poku and Ciara Duggan members of the Data Protection team at Clarkslegal will be discussing the main developments in the UK Data Protection scene from 2022 and what trends to look out for in 2023.
- 25 January 2023
Government’s response to menopause recommendations in the workplace
The UK Government has recently rejected calls for the menopause to be made a ‘protected characteristic’ and for a large-scale pilot of menopause leave.
- 24 January 2023
Can I still apply to the EU Settlement Scheme after my divorce?
A family member of a ‘qualifying’ EEA national (including the EU, Switzerland, Norway, Iceland, and Liechtenstein) must apply for an EU Settlement Scheme (EUSS) Family Permit to join their EEA family member in the UK. The EUSS Family Permit is valid for 6 months, and once in the UK, the family member must apply for status under the EU Settlement Scheme.