Search

How can we help?

Icon

Whistle-blowing – ‘Allegation’ and ‘Information’ are not alternative concepts and suspension was an ongoing detriment

The recent case of Kilraine v London Borough of Wandsworth has demonstrated that when assessing if there has been a disclosure of information, for whistle-blowing purposes, ‘information’ and ‘allegations’ are often intertwined and Tribunals should not fall into the trap of treating disclosures as either one or the other. Further, suspending an employee will constitute a continuing detriment and not just one that takes place at the point of suspension.

For a disclosure to attract whistle-blowing protection it must involve a ‘disclosure of information’ which means that it must convey facts.  In light of this, mere allegations (such as ‘you are not complying with health and safety allegations’) will not amount to a disclosure of information.

In this particular case the Claimant made four disclosures, following which she was suspended pending a disciplinary investigation into whether she had raised unfounded allegations against her colleagues. During the Claimant’s period of suspension she was made redundant. The Claimant believed that her suspension and dismissal were on the grounds of her making protected disclosures and claimed unlawful detriment and unfair dismissal in the Employment Tribunal (“ET”). Her claims were dismissed, by both the ET and, later, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (“EAT”).  However, one of the disclosures prompted different views on the relationship between ‘allegations’ and ‘information’.

Monica Atwal

MANAGING PARTNER

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

For a disclosure to attract whistle-blowing protection it must involve a ‘disclosure of information’ which means that it must convey facts

The disclosure in question was an email the Claimant had sent to HR stating that, at a meeting on 16th June 2010, her line manager had failed to support her when she had raised a safeguarding issue.  The ET held that this was allegation as oppose to a disclosure of information.  However, the EAT was of the view that whilst the email did seem to make an allegation, it also gave information about what had happened during the meeting.  The EAT warned Tribunals against trying to fit a disclosure into either an ‘allegation’ or ‘information’ when in reality a disclosure may be both.

Also of note in this case, was the decision of the EAT that the Claimant’s suspension was a continuing act and thus amounted to an ongoing detriment.

This case provides useful clarification that whilst allegations alone cannot amount to a ‘disclosure of information’ they may, in reality, also contain information capable of meeting this test.  However, the case also demonstrates the complexities inherent in assessing if a disclosure is protected, with the Tribunals themselves holding different views!

About this article

Disclaimer

This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Monica Atwal

MANAGING PARTNER

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 08 June 2023
  • Employment

Pride Month

With the month of June, comes not only the hot sun and longer days, but also vibrant colours, joyous celebrations and messages of acceptance for the LGBTQ+ community.

Pub
  • 08 June 2023
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Freehold Block Management – Tenants taking control – Right to manage

This guide aims to provide freeholders and managing agents with a brief overview of the ‘Right to Manage’ procedure including when it applies and what to do if leaseholders serve notice under the CLRA.

art
  • 01 June 2023
  • Employment

Facts employees should know about their personal data

We previously published an article on facts an employer should know about holding personal data, so it is only fair that we also write about the other side of the coin – facts employees should know as individuals whose personal data is held by their employer.

art
  • 01 June 2023
  • Immigration

What is the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) and how much do you have to pay?

The Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) is a levy on companies who sponsor migrant workers. This levy was imposed on 6 April 2017. The Government states that the charge has been levied to contribute towards addressing the skills gap in the local economy.

art
  • 26 May 2023
  • Employment

Avoiding discrimination in flexible working requests

The right to request flexible working is currently available to employees with at least 26 weeks’ service and is set to be extended further under new Government reforms.

art
  • 25 May 2023
  • Corporate and M&A

Management Buyout – Top 5 things to consider

A management buyout is a financial transaction in which a member of the management team purchases the company from its registered owner. MBO’s usually occur in private companies in an effort to enhance profitability and simplify strategies.