Search

How can we help?

Icon

Whistle-blowing – ‘Allegation’ and ‘Information’ are not alternative concepts and suspension was an ongoing detriment

The recent case of Kilraine v London Borough of Wandsworth has demonstrated that when assessing if there has been a disclosure of information, for whistle-blowing purposes, ‘information’ and ‘allegations’ are often intertwined and Tribunals should not fall into the trap of treating disclosures as either one or the other. Further, suspending an employee will constitute a continuing detriment and not just one that takes place at the point of suspension.

For a disclosure to attract whistle-blowing protection it must involve a ‘disclosure of information’ which means that it must convey facts.  In light of this, mere allegations (such as ‘you are not complying with health and safety allegations’) will not amount to a disclosure of information.

In this particular case the Claimant made four disclosures, following which she was suspended pending a disciplinary investigation into whether she had raised unfounded allegations against her colleagues. During the Claimant’s period of suspension she was made redundant. The Claimant believed that her suspension and dismissal were on the grounds of her making protected disclosures and claimed unlawful detriment and unfair dismissal in the Employment Tribunal (“ET”). Her claims were dismissed, by both the ET and, later, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (“EAT”).  However, one of the disclosures prompted different views on the relationship between ‘allegations’ and ‘information’.

Monica Atwal

Managing Partner

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

For a disclosure to attract whistle-blowing protection it must involve a ‘disclosure of information’ which means that it must convey facts

The disclosure in question was an email the Claimant had sent to HR stating that, at a meeting on 16th June 2010, her line manager had failed to support her when she had raised a safeguarding issue.  The ET held that this was allegation as oppose to a disclosure of information.  However, the EAT was of the view that whilst the email did seem to make an allegation, it also gave information about what had happened during the meeting.  The EAT warned Tribunals against trying to fit a disclosure into either an ‘allegation’ or ‘information’ when in reality a disclosure may be both.

Also of note in this case, was the decision of the EAT that the Claimant’s suspension was a continuing act and thus amounted to an ongoing detriment.

This case provides useful clarification that whilst allegations alone cannot amount to a ‘disclosure of information’ they may, in reality, also contain information capable of meeting this test.  However, the case also demonstrates the complexities inherent in assessing if a disclosure is protected, with the Tribunals themselves holding different views!

About this article

Disclaimer

This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Monica Atwal

Managing Partner

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 21 November 2023
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Privacy matters: How the 8 data subject rights protect personal data

In this guide we explore the 8 data subject rights under the UK GDPR and discover how they play a vital role in preserving your organisation’s privacy standards in an increasingly interconnected world.

Pub
  • 21 November 2023
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Overview of Data Subject Access Requests

In recent months, we have witnessed a series of high-profile data breaches that have brought data protection issues to the forefront of the public’s mind and with this comes an increase in Data Subject Access Requests (DSARs).

art
  • 17 November 2023
  • Corporate and M&A

Should AI delete humans out of the legal sphere?

AI could potentially streamline routine legal tasks. However, there are consequences to consider when it comes to AI in the legal sphere.

art
  • 17 November 2023
  • Immigration

Controversial Immigration Health Surcharge Fee Increase and Budgetary Concerns

The proposed increase to the IHS has raised concerns, especially among businesses who financially support their sponsored workers’ visa applications.

Pub
  • 16 November 2023
  • Employment

TUPE Podcast Series: Service Provision Changes – Single specific events or tasks of short duration

In this fourth podcast in our TUPE Podcast Series, Amanda Glover will be looking at the second of the three conditions required for a service provision change transfer..

art
  • 16 November 2023
  • Commercial Real Estate

Navigating Telecom agreements: landlords beware

A telecommunications agreement, or wayleave agreement, is a contract between a service provider and a landowner which allows the service operator access to install infrastructure on the privately owned land, in return for wayleave fees.