Search

How can we help?

Icon

What happens when a business tenant remains in occupation after the expiry of its lease?

Difficulties can arise when a business tenant remains in occupation of a property when its right to do so has come to an end. This may be because the tenant has a lease that does not carry security of tenure under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (“the Act”) and the lease has expired. Alternatively the lease may be protected by the Act, but, following service by the landlord or tenant of notices under section 25 or section 26 of the Act, the tenant has not taken any steps to issue a claim for a new lease or extend time for doing so.

Often when a tenant remains in occupation it is because negotiations for a new lease are ongoing, and usually in this case the tenant will have a tenancy at will – a type of unprotected tenancy which can be ended at any time.

However, there is a risk that, if the situation is not resolved promptly, the parties can find themselves with an implied periodic tenancy. The legal status of the tenant will always depend on the specific circumstances of each case, but the key factors the courts will look at are whether rent is being paid and accepted, and whether the parties are actively engaged in negotiations for a new lease.

Often when a tenant remains in occupation it is because negotiations for a new lease are ongoing.

It is often landlords who will want to avoid a periodic tenancy arising, as any such tenancy will be protected by the Act (even if the expired lease was itself outside the Act). This means that the tenant will have security of tenure, and the landlord’s ability to terminate the lease will be significantly restricted. Sometimes, though, an implied periodic tenancy could disadvantage the tenant, if the tenant in fact decides that it no longer wants a new tenancy and wants to vacate the premises – the tenant may find itself liable for rent and service charges for a lengthy notice period.

Given the uncertainty in this area and the risks for both landlords and tenants if a periodic tenancy arises, parties should not allow the situation to drift after the expiry of a lease or section 25/section 26 notice. Landlords should ensure that they do not demand or accept rent, and should consider putting written tenancies at will in place if negotiations for a new lease are ongoing. If negotiations stall, immediate action should be taken to regain possession of the premises.

If you have any queries on any of these points please contact our landlord and tenant solicitors.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 08 May 2025
  • Employment

Statutory Sick Pay Scheme changes: how can employers prepare for such changes?

The government has recently changed the Statutory Sick Pay provisions; it is anticipated that such changes will ‘help people to stay in work and grow the economy’.

Pub
  • 07 May 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

Thinking of exiting your business? Part 1

In the first part of this three-part series, we explore why planning your exit strategy early can shape the way you build, grow, and eventually sell your business for maximum value. From mindset to strategy, we unpack how thinking about the end from the beginning can lead to smarter decisions and better outcomes.

Pub
  • 07 May 2025
  • Immigration

UK Immigration: Essential update for employers

The UK’s immigration system will see major changes in 2025. Watch our UK immigration specialists, Ruth Karimatsenga and Monica Mastropasqua, as they explore the key updates and how they affect your business.

art
  • 06 May 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

Can a disclosure letter give rise to a misrepresentation claim?

Provided by a seller to a buyer, a disclosure letter is an important element in any business sale or purchase transaction.

art
  • 02 May 2025
  • Employment

Sex, Gender and the Law: What the Supreme Court’s Recent Ruling Means for Employers

The recent UK Supreme Court decision in For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers  UKSC 16 has generated significant attention, but for most employers, we would argue that its practical impact is relatively limited—at least for now.

art
  • 29 April 2025
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Use of Personal Devices at Work: Why a Bring Your Own Device Policy is Essential

We will highlight in this article what changes have been made to the DUAB since the early stages of the Bill.