- 21 January 2022
- Commercial Real Estate
Where a headlease is surrendered
The intermediate tenant under the headlease falls away and the tenant under the sublease becomes the direct tenant of the superior landlord. This means that the premises will continue to be occupied by the tenant on the terms of the sublease.
For this reason superior landlords will want to retain control over the terms of the sublease by way of restrictions imposed in the headlease’s alienation clause (although it is important to note that even if the underlease is granted in breach of covenant, the underlease will not come to an end on surrender). The head landlord will also want to investigate the terms of any sublease in existence before agreeing the terms of a surrender with the intermediate tenant.
If headlease forfeited
By contrast, if it is forfeited by the superior landlord for a breach of the covenants, all interests deriving (including a sublease) will come to an end. The subtenant may then apply to the court for relief from forfeiture, however where the subtenant is granted such relief, it would remain in occupation under the terms agreed by the court (for a term that is no longer than the original term of the sublease).
The court’s discretion to grant relief from forfeiture is wide and while the court could grant relief and permit the subtenant to remain in occupation on the sublease terms, it can be difficult for the subtenant to persuade the court this is an appropriate remedy.
If headlease is disclaimed
Finally, if it is disclaimed on the insolvency of the head tenant, bringing to an end all of the intermediate tenant’s rights and obligations, the superior landlord will not become the direct legal landlord of the subtenant.
Instead, the subtenant retains a set of rights to remain in occupation of the disclaimed premises but as with the forfeiture of a headlease, this will be for a term that is no longer than the original term of the sublease and will be strictly on the basis that the subtenant complies with the terms including payment of all rent. This can be a particularly onerous obligation on the subtenant where the rent under the headlease is higher than the rent payable under the sublease.
Where a headlease is surrendered the intermediate tenant under the headlease falls away and the tenant under the sublease becomes the direct tenant of the superior landlord
The terms of the headlease are not directly enforceable between the subtenant and the landlord but the landlord can re-enter the property for breach of the headlease terms notwithstanding the fact that the headlease has been determined . The landlord’s right to re-enter the disclaimed property is subject to the subtenant’s right to apply for relief from forfeiture under section 146(4) of the LPA 1925.
Since the terms of the headlease and the underlease are not directly enforceable between the landlord and the subtenant or mortgagee (unless the subtenant has entered into direct covenants with the landlord, for example in a licence to sublet), the parties are left in an unsatisfactory position if the headlease is disclaimed. To alleviate the situation (in particular, to enable the subtenant to enforce the landlord’s covenants), the court has the power to make an order vesting the disclaimed property in anyone who is entitled to and has applied for the disclaimed property to be vested in them
Accordingly, the subtenant may apply for the disclaimed headlease to be vested in him although this is only likely to occur if the headlease is on better or no worse terms than the sublease and does not include property other than that demised under the underlease.
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.
About this article
SubjectWhat happens to a sublease when the headlease is surrendered, forfeited or disclaimed?
ExpertiseCommercial Real Estate
Published21 January 2022
Read, listen and watch our latest insights
- 30 November 2022
- Privacy and Data Protection
Clarkslegal act for a multi-national company on an International Data Transfer Agreement
We recently acted for the UK arm of a multi-national company in connection with the transfer of personal data to an HR services-provider based in the United States.
- 29 November 2022
Employer who shared personal contact details, tribunal rules unfairly dismissed – Monica Atwal writes for People Management
Monica Atwal, Managing Partner at Clarkslegal LLP comments in the People Management on Sales adviser who gave personal number to customers and waited five months for disciplinary hearing was unfairly dismissed, tribunal rules.
- 28 November 2022
- Corporate and M&A
2023: Investment & Acquisition Opportunities in the Chaos?
2023 is looking like it will be a tough year, but some adaptable entrepreneurs and businesses are viewing the current economic climate as an opportunity. Planning strategic investments in the business and assets of distressed companies. Often these businesses have the potential to thrive but have been affected by circumstances outside their control.
- 23 November 2022
- Privacy and Data Protection
Latest developments in UK data protection and cybersecurity
The UK data protection landscape has been everchanging particularly since the Government’s announcement to reform its data protection legislation following Brexit through the Data Protection and Digital Information Bill, and the updated process on international data transfers.
- 22 November 2022
Imposing new terms on employees: the Twitter dilemma?
Twitter has made headlines yet again after its new owner, Elon Musk, has given employees an ultimatum: work long hours at high intensity, or quit and receive 3 months’ severance pay. Employees were given until Thursday 17 November 2022 to make a decision, which was around 24 hours after the ultimatum was given.