Search

How can we help?

Icon

Warning to employers not to ignore gender and ethnicity pay gaps as new Equal Pay Bill proposed

If it becomes law the new bill would require more employers to comply with gender pay gap reporting and report on ethnicity pay gaps for the first time. It could also give female and BME employees the right to know what their male or non BME colleagues are paid.

The Equal Pay (Information and Claims) Bill proposes to:

  • Require employers with 100 or more employees to publish their gender pay gap data;
  • Require employers with 100 or more employees to publish their ethnicity pay gap data;
  • Allow employees to request the pay data of a comparator if they believe there is a gap, and create a right to equal pay where a “single source” can address it; and
  • Reform the remedies and time limits relating to equal pay.

When introducing the Bill, its sponsor Stella Creasy MP (Labour) said the Bill seeks to “break the culture of discrimination and culture of secrecy” behind unequal pay, and argued greater transparency was the way to do so. The Bill comes after this year’s gender pay gap reporting deadline was postponed due to the pandemic.

The Bill has cross-party support, but it is uncertain whether the Bill has the support of the Government it will need to become law. The second reading for this Bill is due to take place on 13 November 2020.

“Employers with 100 or more employees to publish their gender pay gap data”

What employers should do now

More data seems to be coming though on the disproportionate effect of the coronavirus pandemic on women and BME workers. Employers must take care not to unlawfully discriminate against groups of female or BME employees when deciding where cuts in pay or hours must fall. Doing some could result in employment tribunal equal pay or other types of discrimination claims as well as some uncomfortable statistics when pay gap reporting resumes.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 22 October 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Shareholders’ Agreements for Founders and Investors – SHA Series Part 3 of 5

A shareholders’ agreement is arguably one of the most valuable corporate governance agreements (along with articles of association) in any private UK company with more than one shareholder.

art
  • 19 October 2026
  • Immigration

Right to Work Checks: Are UK businesses becoming immigration enforcement officers?

The UK’s Right to Work regime has undergone a significant expansion, with changes taking effect from 1 October 2026.

art
  • 15 October 2026

Clarkslegal celebrates continued success in Chambers and Partners UK 2027

Clarkslegal is delighted to announce that we have once again been recognised by Chambers and Partners UK 2027, celebrating continued success across the firm and a number of enhanced individual rankings.

Pub
  • 15 October 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Data breaches and ICO investigations: Responding with confidence

In this podcast Harry Berryman and Zahra Navarro discuss recent ICO enforcement action, common causes of data breaches, and the practical steps organisations should take to respond effectively when incidents occur.

art
  • 14 October 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

London Court of International Arbitration v International Chamber of Commerce: Key differences

Compare LCIA and ICC arbitration rules, costs, confidentiality provisions and expedited procedures. Learn the key differences between these leading international arbitration institutions and how to choose the right option for your commercial dispute.

art
  • 09 October 2026
  • Employment

Neurodiversity, probation and unfair dismissal: What employers need to know

The next few years are introducing landmark changes to employment law in the UK, under the Employment Rights Act 2025. Part of these changes include the amendments to rights to unfair dismissal, reducing the qualifying period for this right to six months.