Search

How can we help?

Icon

Warning to employers not to ignore gender and ethnicity pay gaps as new Equal Pay Bill proposed

If it becomes law the new bill would require more employers to comply with gender pay gap reporting and report on ethnicity pay gaps for the first time. It could also give female and BME employees the right to know what their male or non BME colleagues are paid.

The Equal Pay (Information and Claims) Bill proposes to:

  • Require employers with 100 or more employees to publish their gender pay gap data;
  • Require employers with 100 or more employees to publish their ethnicity pay gap data;
  • Allow employees to request the pay data of a comparator if they believe there is a gap, and create a right to equal pay where a “single source” can address it; and
  • Reform the remedies and time limits relating to equal pay.

When introducing the Bill, its sponsor Stella Creasy MP (Labour) said the Bill seeks to “break the culture of discrimination and culture of secrecy” behind unequal pay, and argued greater transparency was the way to do so. The Bill comes after this year’s gender pay gap reporting deadline was postponed due to the pandemic.

The Bill has cross-party support, but it is uncertain whether the Bill has the support of the Government it will need to become law. The second reading for this Bill is due to take place on 13 November 2020.

“Employers with 100 or more employees to publish their gender pay gap data”

What employers should do now

More data seems to be coming though on the disproportionate effect of the coronavirus pandemic on women and BME workers. Employers must take care not to unlawfully discriminate against groups of female or BME employees when deciding where cuts in pay or hours must fall. Doing some could result in employment tribunal equal pay or other types of discrimination claims as well as some uncomfortable statistics when pay gap reporting resumes.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 09 December 2024
  • Corporate and M&A

UK Directors’ Responsibilities

On becoming a director of a company, directors undertake to comply with various duties and responsibilities. which are specified in the Companies Act 2006. In this article, we will explain how you can comply with these practical responsibilities.

art
  • 09 December 2024
  • Commercial Real Estate

What happens to a sublease when the headlease is surrendered, forfeited or disclaimed?

The intermediate tenant under the headlease falls away and the tenant under the sublease becomes the direct tenant of the superior landlord.

art
  • 09 December 2024
  • Employment

Mistletoe and Missteps: Preventing Harassment at Christmas Parties

As the festive season approaches, offices are coming together for their annual Christmas parties, offering a chance to unwind and celebrate the year’s achievements. However, whilst these events provide a necessary release and recognition of employee’s contributions, they also present a heightened risk of inappropriate behaviour, particularly sexual harassment.

art
  • 03 December 2024
  • Immigration

UPDATE – Ministers to postpone full eVisa rollout amid fears of UK residents being stranded abroad

The UK government will postpone the full transition to eVisas, initially planned for 1 January 2025, following concerns that system glitches could leave UK residents stranded abroad.

art
  • 02 December 2024
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

The Era of AI

In this recent case, the First-Tier Tribunal gave a stark warning to litigants about use of AI in litigation.

art
  • 28 November 2024
  • Employment

Employment Rights Bill: The Regulatory Policy Committee opinion

This article considers the Regulatory Policy Committee’s recently published opinion on the impact assessments for the Employment Rights Bill. The Committee assessed the quality of evidence and analysis used to inform the government proposals and came to the overall opinion that the impact assessments are currently “not fit for purpose”.