Search

How can we help?

Icon

Vicarious liability for remote Christmas parties

Festivities will be very different this year. Despite exiting a national Lockdown this week, 98.7% of the population in England find themselves in tiers 2 or 3 in the run up to Christmas. As such, meeting indoors with anyone outside your household is forbidden. It looks like for the majority, a work Christmas party can only take place remotely, or limited to 6 people outside.

With this in mind, we wanted to warn employers about vicarious liability surrounding Christmas parties and work events; even for those taking place via zoom.

The well-established Court of Appeal case of Bellman v Northampton Recruitment Ltd [2018] held that an employer could be vicariously liable for acts carried out by employee’s ‘in the course of employment’.

In this case, a manager severely injured a college at an unscheduled drinking session that occurred following the Christmas party. Whilst court held that the unscheduled drinking session was not necessarily a seamless extension of the company’s Christmas party, the attack happened after a discussion about business matters which the manager’s decision-making had been challenged by the victim.

We wanted to warn employers about vicarious liability surrounding Christmas parties and work events; even for those taking place via zoom.

Of course, remote parties will protect colleagues from physical acts of violence like in the above case. However, employers should be aware of potential harassment and discrimination claims that could arise from colleagues making inappropriate and offensive comments at remote parties once the drinks start flowing, or otherwise.

The Northampton Recruitment case provides a stark reminder for employers that they could find themselves vicariously liable for acts of their employee’s at Christmas parties, other work events or even separate colleague organised events if committed in the ‘course of employment’.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 12 September 2024
  • Privacy and Data Protection

2024 in review: tracking key data protection developments

As we approach the final quarter of 2024, it’s an opportune moment to revisit the data protection trends and developments that were anticipated at the end of 2023. Now, let’s see how those predictions have played out.

art
  • 10 September 2024
  • Employment

Sun, Fun and fairness – Amanda Glover writes for Business Voice magazine

Amanda Glover in Business Voice magazine discusses how employees at Harrods, the iconic luxury department store in London, are considering strike action over what the workers deem to be a discriminatory annual leave policy.

Pub
  • 06 September 2024
  • Corporate and M&A

How to exit your business – Reading Seminar

Due to popular demand, Nicky Goringe Larkin and Stuart Mullins, will be hosting a repeat of the ‘How to exit your business’ seminar at Clarkslegal’s Reading office.

Pub
  • 05 September 2024
  • Public Procurement

Public Procurement Annual Update 2024

The Procurement Act 2023 is coming into force on 28 October 2024, bringing with it major changes to public procurement procedures and legal remedies. Join our Public Procurement team as they provide you with the essential information you need to know.

art
  • 02 September 2024
  • Employment

Social Media – how private is your personal data

Nowadays most people have at least one social media account. Whether it’s Facebook or TikTok, X, or LinkedIn, most adults have an online presence.

art
  • 29 August 2024
  • Privacy and Data Protection

What a controller or a processor needs to know…in a nutshell

Data processing agreements are a common feature of contracts for the supply of services, for example often featuring as self-contained schedules to master services agreements.