Search

How can we help?

Icon

Urgent procurement in a pandemic

Depending on the value and size of the contract, a typical procurement run in accordance with the requirements of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 can take anything from a few months to more than a year to conclude.

Regulation 32(2)(c) does however provide an exception for contracts which are required for reasons of extreme urgency brought about by events unforeseeable by the contracting authority. Where this exception applies and it is not possible for the time limits for the open, restricted or competitive negotiation procedures to be used as a result of that urgency, a public body may award a contract using the negotiated procedure without advertising it and following the usual procurement processes.

Depending on the value and size of the contract, a typical procurement run in accordance with the requirements of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 can take anything from a few months to more than a year to conclude.

The COVID-19 pandemic was unprecedented and many contracting authorities have, since March 2020, relied on the Regulation 32(2)(c) exception to award urgent pandemic-related contracts without running a full regulated tender. Providing the conditions of Regulation 32 are met, this is permitted. However, contracting authorities need to be very careful to ensure that they do not abuse the Regulation 32(2)(c) exception, the requirements of which are as follows:

  1. There is extreme urgency;
  2. The extreme urgency has been brought about by events which were unforeseeable by the contracting authority;
  3. The time limits for regulated tenders cannot be complied with;
  4. The extreme urgency is not attributable in any way to the contracting authority.

In addition, contracts may only be awarded insofar as they are strictly necessary.

During the course of the pandemic, contracting authorities have relied on Regulation 32(2)(c) to award a large number of contracts worth many billions of pounds, including in particular contracts for the supply of PPE and for lab testing. Both the size and scale of these direct awards, and the process adopted by contracting authorities in awarding them, have been subject to media scrutiny and, in some cases, legal challenge by bidders.

Whilst it may be legitimate for contracting authorities to use Regulation 32(2)(c) in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, contracting authorities must be careful to ensure that their decisions are properly documented; that the contracts awarded do not go further than strictly necessary; and the process adopted complies with general EU Treaty principles of equality, transparency and proportionality. Contracting authorities should also be aware that as the pandemic continues, reliance on Regulation 32(2)(c) will become more difficult as the effects of the virus can no longer be described as unforeseeable.

On the other side of the coin, bidders should keep under review the contracts directly awarded by contracting authorities, which must be published on Contracts Finder and in OJEU, currently, and post-Brexit on the new UK Find a Tender service, which will go live on 1 January 2021. If bidders feel they have missed out on a valuable opportunity, they should take early legal advice in order to determine whether they may have any grounds for challenging a direct award.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 29 July 2025
  • Commercial Real Estate

Right to Renew: The Law Commission’s Statement

Many commercial tenants occupy their premises under tenancies. Part 2 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (the “Act”) gives these business tenants the right to remain in their premises when their tenancies would have otherwise come to an end, this is known as a “right to renew” or “security of tenure”.

art
  • 29 July 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

Articles of Association v. Shareholders Agreement in England and Wales: Which one works best for you and your company?

The decision of whether to solely rely on a company’s Articles of Association or implement a bespoke Shareholders’ Agreement depends on the specific needs and priorities of the individual shareholders and the company alike.

Pub
  • 28 July 2025
  • Employment

Talking Employment Law: The Employment Rights Bill – Part 3

In part three of the Employment Rights Bill podcast series, Louise Keenan and Lucy White, members of the employment team, will discuss changes to fire and re-hire practices, harassment, zero-hour contracts and tribunal limitation periods.

art
  • 24 July 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

Deal Announcement: Clarkslegal’s corporate lawyers advise on the sale of Just Construction Recruitment Ltd to ASAP TT SAS

Clarkslegal’s corporate team is pleased to have advised the shareholders of Just Construction Recruitment Ltd on the sale of the company to French based, ASAP TT SAS.

art
  • 23 July 2025
  • Immigration

Home Office Announces Major Changes to Skilled Worker Route

On 1 July 2025, the Home Office released a new Statement of Changes (HC 997), delivering on the first phase of what the government calls a “sweeping reform” to the immigration system, as set out in the May 2025 Immigration White Paper. The changes to the Immigration Rules were enforced on 22 July 2025.

art
  • 21 July 2025
  • Employment

When the ‘Kiss Cam’ Captures More Than Just a Moment: Romantic Relationships in the Workplace and the Legal Risks

Imagine this: A packed Coldplay concert. Tens of thousands of fans. Suddenly, the “kiss cam” camera pans to the crowd and lands on a man and woman sharing an affectionate embrace.