Search

How can we help?

Icon

Urgent procurement in a pandemic

Depending on the value and size of the contract, a typical procurement run in accordance with the requirements of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 can take anything from a few months to more than a year to conclude.

Regulation 32(2)(c) does however provide an exception for contracts which are required for reasons of extreme urgency brought about by events unforeseeable by the contracting authority. Where this exception applies and it is not possible for the time limits for the open, restricted or competitive negotiation procedures to be used as a result of that urgency, a public body may award a contract using the negotiated procedure without advertising it and following the usual procurement processes.

Depending on the value and size of the contract, a typical procurement run in accordance with the requirements of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 can take anything from a few months to more than a year to conclude.

The COVID-19 pandemic was unprecedented and many contracting authorities have, since March 2020, relied on the Regulation 32(2)(c) exception to award urgent pandemic-related contracts without running a full regulated tender. Providing the conditions of Regulation 32 are met, this is permitted. However, contracting authorities need to be very careful to ensure that they do not abuse the Regulation 32(2)(c) exception, the requirements of which are as follows:

  1. There is extreme urgency;
  2. The extreme urgency has been brought about by events which were unforeseeable by the contracting authority;
  3. The time limits for regulated tenders cannot be complied with;
  4. The extreme urgency is not attributable in any way to the contracting authority.

In addition, contracts may only be awarded insofar as they are strictly necessary.

During the course of the pandemic, contracting authorities have relied on Regulation 32(2)(c) to award a large number of contracts worth many billions of pounds, including in particular contracts for the supply of PPE and for lab testing. Both the size and scale of these direct awards, and the process adopted by contracting authorities in awarding them, have been subject to media scrutiny and, in some cases, legal challenge by bidders.

Whilst it may be legitimate for contracting authorities to use Regulation 32(2)(c) in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, contracting authorities must be careful to ensure that their decisions are properly documented; that the contracts awarded do not go further than strictly necessary; and the process adopted complies with general EU Treaty principles of equality, transparency and proportionality. Contracting authorities should also be aware that as the pandemic continues, reliance on Regulation 32(2)(c) will become more difficult as the effects of the virus can no longer be described as unforeseeable.

On the other side of the coin, bidders should keep under review the contracts directly awarded by contracting authorities, which must be published on Contracts Finder and in OJEU, currently, and post-Brexit on the new UK Find a Tender service, which will go live on 1 January 2021. If bidders feel they have missed out on a valuable opportunity, they should take early legal advice in order to determine whether they may have any grounds for challenging a direct award.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 27 March 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Shareholder Disputes: What to do when disputes arise – Episode 4

Join Stuart Mullins and Jack Hobbs for episode four of our Shareholder Disputes podcast series as they confront the realities of shareholder fallouts and share practical strategies for managing these complex situations.

art
  • 24 March 2026
  • Immigration

Spouse Visa – Is your relationship genuine and subsisting?

For years many couples have become frustrated by the requirements for a spouse visa as the rules and guidance are difficult to understand. A significant amount of applications are rejected on the basis of the applicant not providing the adequate documents to evidence the relationship requirement.

art
  • 20 March 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Drag-Along & Tag-Along Rights: Why Every Company Needs Them

When starting a company, very few founders are aware of the potential issues around shares, share ownership and the implications of that when selling their company.

art
  • 19 March 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

WhatsApp in the Workplace

This article explores the potential risks of using WhatsApp for workplace communications, the implications for GDPR compliance and under UK legislation, and provides practical tips for employers to mitigate these risks.

art
  • 16 March 2026
  • Employment

Trade Union Law Changes from April 2026

April brings the next tranche of reforms under the Employment Rights Act 2025 including changes to the statutory recognition scheme making it easier for trade unions to be recognised in the workplace.

Pub
  • 16 March 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Shareholder Disputes: Managing Shareholder Buyouts and Exits – Episode 3

Join Stuart Mullins and Nicky Goringe Larkin for the third episode of our Shareholder Disputes series, where we move from prevention to resolution—exploring what happens when a founder’s exit becomes unavoidable.