Search

How can we help?

Icon

Elected Union Officials were agents under the Equality Act

The Employment Appeal Tribunal has decided that two elected workplace union officials, despite not being the union’s employees, were its agents and therefore the union could be held liable for their acts of discrimination against an employee.

The case of Unite the Union v Nailard, concerned the sexual harassment of a female union employee by two elected male union officials. The officials were actually employed by Heathrow Airport Ltd, which had an agreement with Unite that they could work full time on union duties. The two officials were authorised to act on the union’s behalf by holding branch meetings, representing members and liaising with paid officers of the union, including the claimant. The harassment and bullying were found to have occurred within the course of these duties. Unite’s defence that they could not be liable for the officers’ acts of discrimination as they were contrary to union policy was rejected.

The case reinforces that under the Equality Act 2010, a business can be liable for the discriminatory acts of not just its employees but also anyone acting as its agent with its authority, where the agent discriminates in the course of carrying out the functions they are authorised to do. This could include consultants, recruitment agencies or agency workers, contractors or their employees.

The case of Unite the Union v Nailard, concerned the sexual harassment of a female union employee by two elected male union officials.

A business cannot avoid liability by merely informing individuals, who carry out tasks and functions on its behalf, that they must not do anything against equality law. To minimise the risk, businesses should consider extending equality and diversity training to those who could be considered their agent.

For factsheets, letters, policies and checklists on discrimination please visit employmentbuddy.com
For further information on how we can support you with discrimination and equality issues, please contact contact@employmentbuddy.com

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 16 May 2024
  • Immigration

What Employers need to know about Biometric Residence Permits

Biometric Residence Permits (BRPs) are biometric immigration documents that are issued to non-EEA nationals and EEA nationals, who have been granted permission to stay in the UK.

art
  • 14 May 2024

Clarkslegal’s London team moves to new Chancery Lane office

The London office of Clarkslegal has relocated to Chancery House, on Chancery Lane. The staff is enthusiastic about the relocation because Chancery Lane has a longstanding association with the legal profession in London.

art
  • 10 May 2024
  • Employment

New duty on employers to prevent sexual harassment – coming October 2024

The Worker Protection (Amendment of Equality Act 2010) Act 2023 is due to come into force in October 2024.

art
  • 09 May 2024
  • Employment

Labour Party Employment Law Proposals – Promises of further consultations and a softer approach

The Prime Minister recently announced a raft of changes, to be implemented in the next parliament, aimed at reducing the number of people who are economically inactive due to illness.

art
  • 09 May 2024
  • Corporate and M&A

Navigating corporate transparency: ECCTA reforms series – part 1

The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 (ECCTA) received Royal Assent in October 2023 and marked a pivotal moment in corporate governance and transparency.

art
  • 07 May 2024
  • Employment

Changes to TUPE rules from 1 July 2024

The Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (‘TUPE’) aim to safeguard employees’ rights on the transfer of a business or on the change of a service.