Search

How can we help?

Icon

The rules on Acas Early Conciliation (EC) changed

The standard EC period is now 6 weeks rather than a month (but there is no longer the possibility of extending it by 2 weeks). Although this may appear to give people 2 weeks longer to submit employment tribunal claims (if they submit the Acas form in time), the EC period can still be brought to an end early by either party informing Acas that they do not wish to conciliate. This generally includes situations where the individual informs Acas not to contact the prospective respondent, so businesses should not face an additional 2 weeks waiting to see if they are facing ‘surprise’ claims.

Since October, employment judges have had more leeway to accept claims where the EC number on the claim form does not match the EC certificate. The other change this week is that Acas has now been given greater scope to correct errors on EC forms. While the individual has always needed to provide their name and address and that of the prospective respondent, Acas is now allowed to correct errors on the form at any time before the end of the EC period.

The standard EC period is now 6 weeks rather than a month (but there is no longer the possibility of extending it by 2 weeks).

This change is further travel in the same direction as the case law which had already limited the ways tribunals could reject claims because an individual made a mistake in the EC process. Overall, this does mean more claims will get through but it is in line with the stated policy behind EC, which is to encourage conciliation of disputes rather than to place procedural hurdles in the path of claimants.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 26 October 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Shareholders’ Agreements for Founders and Investors – SHA Series Part 3 of 5

A shareholders’ agreement is arguably one of the most valuable corporate governance agreements (along with articles of association) in any private UK company with more than one shareholder.

art
  • 23 October 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Section 172 Companies Act 2006: Key lessons from Saxon Woods v Costa

The Supreme Court’s decision in Saxon Woods v Costa UKSC 21 clarifies directors’ duties under Section 172 Companies Act 2006, confirming that good faith requires both honest belief and appropriate conduct.

art
  • 19 October 2026
  • Immigration

Right to Work Checks: Are UK businesses becoming immigration enforcement officers?

The UK’s Right to Work regime has undergone a significant expansion, with changes taking effect from 1 October 2026.

art
  • 15 October 2026

Clarkslegal celebrates continued success in Chambers and Partners UK 2027

Clarkslegal is delighted to announce that we have once again been recognised by Chambers and Partners UK 2027, celebrating continued success across the firm and a number of enhanced individual rankings.

Pub
  • 15 October 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Data breaches and ICO investigations: Responding with confidence

In this podcast Harry Berryman and Zahra Navarro discuss recent ICO enforcement action, common causes of data breaches, and the practical steps organisations should take to respond effectively when incidents occur.

art
  • 14 October 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

London Court of International Arbitration v International Chamber of Commerce: Key differences

Compare LCIA and ICC arbitration rules, costs, confidentiality provisions and expedited procedures. Learn the key differences between these leading international arbitration institutions and how to choose the right option for your commercial dispute.