Search

How can we help?

Icon

The right to disconnect 

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has meant that, for many people, the boundary between work and home life has become blurred. A vast amount of people were suddenly required to work from home which meant for many, homes became offices and this has resulted in many struggling to disconnect from work outside of their working hours. 

Even as we move beyond the pandemic, it seems likely that home working will now be a part of the ‘new normal’ and with many businesses taking steps to transition to a new hybrid way of working, these issues are unlikely to disappear. With this in mind, as employers have a duty to protect the health and safety of employees, they should be taking care to consider how employees can be supported with their ‘right to disconnect’. 

What is the right to disconnect? 

The ‘right to disconnect’ would ensure all employees have a right to not have to work outside their normal agreed hours and not have to engage in any work-related communications including emails, telephone calls, instant messaging etc. 

Other countries have taken different approaches on how to implement the right to disconnect and for some, action had been taken long before the pandemic began. For example, France, Italy and Spain have all introduced legislation which grants workers the right to not have to respond to work-related communications outside their working hours and protects them from being penalised for this. Ireland have approached the issue by introducing a legislative code focusing on three key rights: 

  • Workers are entitled to not perform work or attend work matters outside their normal working hours; 
  • Workers have a right not to suffer a detriment to refuse to work outside their normal working hours; and 
  • Both workers and employers have a duty to respect their colleagues right to disconnect which includes not responding to emails when they aren’t working. 

However, it is appreciated that it is difficult to introduce legislation which provides clear rules to protect employees but also allows for flexibility for businesses with hybrid workers. 

Even as we move beyond the pandemic, it seems likely that home working will now be a part of the ‘new normal’ and with many businesses taking steps to transition to a new hybrid way of working. 

How can employers support an employee’s right to disconnect? 

The UK government are yet to announce whether they intend to introduce any laws or regulations which focus on the ‘right to disconnect’. However, this right could be of benefit to both employees and businesses as establishing an effective work-life balance is crucial in avoiding burn-out and maximising productivity during working hours.  

There is however a balance that needs to be found as it may be detrimental to be too prescriptive with any new rules aimed to support the ‘right to disconnect’ (such as a ban on working outside of working hours) as this runs the risk of removing the positive aspect of remote working which allows for more flexibility.  

Employers may consider the following potential action in the meantime: 

  • Communicate clearly with employees on what is required from them during this ‘new normal’; 
  • Offer mental health awareness training in the workplace which may need to be adapted for varying levels of seniority; 
  • Encourage employees to use their annual leave. Employers should also ensure that there is a system in place for adequate handover and cover when employees are on annual leave to reduce the need to contact them or for them to feel as though they need to work when they are on leave; 
  • Highlight and promote the importance of taking breaks and not working outside of working hours including checking emails to help employees find a clear divide between their work and their personal lives. This could also include encouraging employees to communicate whether urgent responses are needed to assist with prioritising workloads; 
  • Arrange for managers to check in with employees regularly to establish work capacity and investigate if they find that an employee has an excessive workload; 
  • Monitor out of hours communications and if there are any concerns, employers should raise this sensitively and have an open conversation to check in with the employee on whether there are any pressures with which they can be supported. 

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 09 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

The Arbitration Act 2025 – Factsheet

This factsheet outlines the major reforms and key developments introduced by the Arbitration Act 2025, including updates on summary disposal, jurisdictional challenges, emergency arbitrators, arbitrator disclosure duties, and governing law in arbitration proceedings.

art
  • 09 July 2026
  • Immigration

Right to Work Checks are changing from 1 October 2026: Is your business ready?

The Home Office’s new rules, effective 1 October 2026, will overhaul right to work checks and raise the risk of civil penalties for UK businesses.

art
  • 08 July 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

ICO prosecutes employee under the Data Protection Act for forwarding client data to his personal email address

The issue of employees taking confidential business information or personal data when moving to a new employer remains a significant concern for businesses.

Pub
  • 07 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Accelerating arbitration: Expedited procedures and key changes in the new ICC Rules – Episode 2

In episode 2, Jack Hobbs (Clarkslegal) and Christopher Howitt (Three Stone) explore how the latest expedited and highly expedited procedures under the ICC Arbitration Rules 2026 are transforming the landscape of dispute resolution.

art
  • 07 July 2026
  • Employment

6 month unfair dismissal rights: What employers need to know

Under the new Employment Rights Act 2025 the minimum period of service required to qualify to bring a statutory claim for unfair dismissal has been reduced from 2 full years to 6 months from 1 January 2027 onwards.  

art
  • 02 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Litigation and Artificial Intelligence: Where are we now?

In the recent case of Cork and another v Smith, the High Court publicly admonished a law firm and two of its solicitors after they had produced and submitted two AI-generated letters to the court containing misleading and false information in relation to a block transfer application made under Rule 12.37 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016.