Search

How can we help?

Icon

Claiming for the cost of replacing cladding   

Much attention and concern has focussed on the use of combustible cladding in high rise buildings since the Grenfell Tower tragedy in 2017 where a fire destroyed the  24-storey block of flats in North Kensington and 72 people died. This prompted an independent review of building regulations and fire safety and local governments have investigated other tower blocks to find those that have similar cladding. Efforts to replace the cladding on these buildings are ongoing. The recent Technology and Construction Court  TCC decision in Martlet Homes Limited v Mulalley & Co Limited is the first occasion where the Court has considered a claim for the cost of replacing such cladding.   

Martlet’s was the owner of five 1960s tower blocks. Mulalley, as design and build contractor, had installed StoTherm Classic (external wall insulation comprising expanded polystyrene) as part of refurbishment works in 2005.   

Following the Grenfell Fire, Martlet replaced the cladding with non-combustible stone wall insulation and instituted a ‘waking watch’ until these works were completed.  It successfully claimed from Mulalley the cost of the works, totalling approximately £8 million. 

Martlet’s claim included: 

  • Mullalley’s installation of the cladding system and its cavity barriers was defective 
  • The use of StoTherm Classic did not meet the fire standards in place at the date of the contract 

The judgment is particularly timely in the light of the extended limitation periods and causes of action introduced by the Building Safety Act 2022, which may open the door to other similar claims. 

Both claims succeeded.  Although every claim will be decided on its own facts and merits, the decision gives a helpful indication of the principles that the Court is likely to apply in other cladding disputes. 

  • The Building Regulations 2000 included an obligation for external walls to resist the spread of fire, taking into account the height, use and position of the building 
  • A British Board of Agrément certificate is not a guarantee of compliance with Building Regulations 
  • An action can still be negligent even it was common practice in the industry at the time 
  • The cost of a waking watch is reasonably foreseeable and likely to awarded as a separate head of loss 

The judgment is particularly timely in the light of the extended limitation periods and causes of action introduced by the Building Safety Act 2022, which may open the door to other similar claims.   

 

 

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 22 September 2023
  • Employment

Talking Employment Law: New family friendly rights

In this first podcast in the ‘Talking Employment Law’ series, Lucy Densham Brown and Rebecca Dowle, members of the employment team summarise some of the big new family-friendly Bills that are working their way through parliament.

art
  • 20 September 2023
  • Commercial Real Estate

Commercial buyers beware of residential Stamp Duty Land Tax

This article discusses a recent case in which a property buyer calculated the Stamp Duty Land Tax due on the purchase at a lower rate, due to the mixed-use purpose of the property.

art
  • 19 September 2023
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Organisations’ use of social media: Data protection

Social media applications (or commonly known as ‘apps’) are being developed all the time and we are constantly being introduced to new social media platforms, some of which take almost no time to gain huge popularity.

art
  • 14 September 2023
  • Immigration

Entrepreneurial Dreams: What is the Innovator Founder Visa?

In an era defined by innovation and entrepreneurship, the United Kingdom has made a substantial effort towards fostering its reputation as a global hub for start-ups and innovators. The introduction of the UK’s ‘Innovator Founder’ route has marked a pivotal moment in the country’s immigration policy.

art
  • 11 September 2023
  • Corporate and M&A

Changes to the tax treatment of Employee Ownership Trusts

The government published a consultation on 18 July 2023 seeking the public’s views on its proposals to reform the tax treatment of Employee Ownership Trusts and Employee Benefit Trusts. Parties are invited to express their opinions via email via the government website until the consultation closes on 25 September 2023.

art
  • 08 September 2023
  • Immigration

Navigating the Latest Immigration Rules for Overstayers in the UK: A Comprehensive Guide for 2023

Staying beyond the expiration of your UK visa is a serious matter that, in most cases, can result in significant and long-lasting repercussions.