- 29 February 2016
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has found that an employment tribunal was wrong in finding that TUPE did not apply where there had been a lay-off of employees as a result of a commercial dispute with the main contractor leading to termination of the contract before the new contractor took on the services (Mustafa v Trek Highways Services Ltd and others UKEAT/0064/15).
In this case, Transport for London (Tfl) contracted with the main contractor to carry out road maintenance services who then subcontracted traffic management services to Trek Highways Services Ltd (Trek). On re-tender, Tfl decided to award the work to a new provider who would take over the services on 1st April 2013. The Claimants were due to transfer to the new provider under TUPE. However, before this date, the main contractor and Trek had a dispute which led to Trek suspending operations on 8th March 2013 and asking staff to go home and wait to be contacted. On 20thMarch 2013, the commercial contract came to an end by agreement and shortly afterwards Trek went into administration.
The main contractor continued to be obliged to provide traffic management services and continued to do so by alternative, ad hoc means pending the services being taken on.
Chambers and Partners
The Clarkslegal team are commercial and good to work with. They get what our business needs and tell me what I need to hear.
The employment tribunal found that there had been no business transfer or service provision change under TUPE given the commercial sub contract had been terminated before the new contract was due to commence. The EAT, however, disagreed stating that the suspension of work did not mean that the entity had ceased to exist. There were still staff, vehicles, and equipment dedicated to the work and the sub-contract remained in existence. Further, in relation to a service provision change under TUPE, it held that the wording of TUPE did not require the organised grouping of employees to be actively engaging in the activity immediately before the transfer and there was nothing in TUPE to suggest that a temporary cessation of activities would preclude there from being an organised grouping.
The case has been remitted to the employment tribunal to reconsider the application of TUPE. It confirms that simply because an outgoing contractor may not actually be performing the services in question at the time of the putative transfer, this does not, in itself, prevent there being a TUPE transfer. In particular, the EAT made clear that the reasons why the activities cease to be carried out (in this case, a commercial dispute) will usually be irrelevant to the application of TUPE.
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.
About this article
SubjectTemporary cessation of work and lay off of employees did not preclude TUPE from applying
Published29 February 2016
Read, listen and watch our latest insights
- 22 September 2023
Talking Employment Law: New family friendly rights
In this first podcast in the ‘Talking Employment Law’ series, Lucy Densham Brown and Rebecca Dowle, members of the employment team summarise some of the big new family-friendly Bills that are working their way through parliament.
- 20 September 2023
- Commercial Real Estate
Commercial buyers beware of residential Stamp Duty Land Tax
This article discusses a recent case in which a property buyer calculated the Stamp Duty Land Tax due on the purchase at a lower rate, due to the mixed-use purpose of the property.
- 19 September 2023
- Privacy and Data Protection
Organisations’ use of social media: Data protection
Social media applications (or commonly known as ‘apps’) are being developed all the time and we are constantly being introduced to new social media platforms, some of which take almost no time to gain huge popularity.
- 14 September 2023
Entrepreneurial Dreams: What is the Innovator Founder Visa?
In an era defined by innovation and entrepreneurship, the United Kingdom has made a substantial effort towards fostering its reputation as a global hub for start-ups and innovators. The introduction of the UK’s ‘Innovator Founder’ route has marked a pivotal moment in the country’s immigration policy.
- 11 September 2023
- Corporate and M&A
Changes to the tax treatment of Employee Ownership Trusts
The government published a consultation on 18 July 2023 seeking the public’s views on its proposals to reform the tax treatment of Employee Ownership Trusts and Employee Benefit Trusts. Parties are invited to express their opinions via email via the government website until the consultation closes on 25 September 2023.