How can we help?


Surrendering leases by operation of law

Is the surrender by operation of law ?

If a tenant wishes to surrender its lease (i.e. give its interest back to the landlord)  it can do so either:

  1. Expressly and by agreement so that the parties enter into a deed of surrender; or
  2. By what is termed “operation of law”, where the acts of both parties to the lease are taken as evidence that the lease has come to an end.  The property in question must be handed back to the landlord and the landlord must accept the handing back.

In an express surrender, it will be clear that the surrender has happened however in a surrender by operation of law, the facts need to be considered carefully.

In the recent case of QFS Scaffolding Limited v Sable and another [2010] EWCA Civ 682 which involved a tenant who went into administrative receivership,  it was judged, on appeal, that the lease had not been surrendered by operation of law.

The basic facts of the case are as follows.  The Tenant, who held a lease (the Lease) of a building yard (the Premises), went into administrative receivership.  They then ceased trading from the Premises.

A company (QFS) who was interested in furthering one part of the Tenant`s business went into occupation of the Premises and started negotiations for a new lease paying a monthly rent direct to the Landlord for their occupation.

During this process, the Landlord, mistakenly, was of the view that the Lease to the Tenant had come to an end as they had moved out, stopped trading and had ceased to pay the rent.  Further the administrative receivers did not mention the Lease in the creditors report which was circulated to, amongst others,  the Landlord (the Landlord being one of the creditors for unpaid sums due under the Lease).

QFS solicitors then wrote to the Landlord stating that it was their belief that the Lease had not been surrendered and that QFS were going to take an assignment of the Lease from the administrative receivers on behalf of the Tenant.

The Landlord disagreed with this view, claiming that QFS simply had a tenancy at will and then sought to end the tenancy at will and regain possession of the Premises.

It was held that the Lease had been validly surrendered by operation of law and the County Court granted the Landlord an order for possession against QFS

By what is termed “operation of law”, where the acts of both parties to the lease are taken as evidence that the lease has come to an end.  The property in question must be handed back to the landlord and the landlord must accept the handing back.

QFS appealed against the decision and the Court set aside an order for possession.

It was held that, although the facts surrounding the Tenant`s original departure might lead the parties to believe that the surrender had taken place the view is that the Tenant had not acted in a way which unequivocally demonstrated that the Lease had ended. Namely:

  • Ceasing to use the Property for its business;
  • Vacating the Property;
  • Not paying rent;
  • Not acknowledging any liability for rent; and
  • Not making any reference to the  Lease in the administrative receiver`s report

The Court did however make it clear that if the Landlord had at the time the Tenant moved out of the Premises granted a new lease to QFS then the old lease would have been surrendered by operation of law.  This is a firmly established principle in  case law that  if a tenant either consents to or requests that a landlord grant a new lease to a new tenant of premises where a lease is being surrendered then the old lease is deemed to have been surrendered immediately before the grant of the new lease.

It is important therefore when surrendering a lease by operation of law that you carefully consider the facts and take proper legal advice.  Best practice is to enter into a deed of surrender so that all parties are clear that the surrender has taken place.

About this article

This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

  • 20 September 2023
  • Commercial Real Estate

Is your property mixed use? Commercial buyers beware of higher residential SDLT

This article discusses a recent case in which a property buyer calculated the Stamp Duty Land Tax due on the purchase at a lower rate, due to the mixed-use purpose of the property.

  • 08 August 2023
  • Commercial Real Estate

Non-binding Head of Terms

The Court of Appeal Case of Pretoria Energy Company (Chittering) Ltd v Blankney Estates Ltd found that a lease clause within a Heads of Terms document was not binding.

  • 11 July 2023
  • Commercial Real Estate

What licences do you need to open a restaurant?

Opening and operating a restaurant can be an exciting venture, but it also involves navigating various legal requirements. One crucial aspect of operating a restaurant is obtaining the necessary licences and permits.

  • 12 June 2023
  • Commercial Real Estate

Conditionality in Agreements for Lease

It is not always possible or desirable for an agreement for lease to be unconditional.  Often, there is a need for an agreement for lease where the ultimate grant of the lease is conditional upon certain conditions being satisfied. 

  • 10 May 2023
  • Commercial Real Estate

Good news for landowners – deposit statement introduced to protect against town green registration

For many years it has been possible under Section 31(6) of the Highways Act 1980 to deposit a statement and map with the local highway authority setting out any public rights of way which are registered as crossing a piece of land.

  • 28 March 2023
  • Commercial Real Estate

Can I have access to a neighbour’s land to carry out works to my property?

We are often asked by landowner clients whether there is any legal right to go on to a neighbour’s land to carry out repair and maintenance works where it is not possible to carry out such works from the landowner’s own property and there is no legal right in place allowing access to the neighbour’s land.