How can we help?


To strike out or not to strike out?

In the recent case of Arriva London North Ltd v Maseya, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that a party’s case should only be struck out in exceptional circumstances.

Mr Maseya has monocular vision and was found to be disabled within the meaning of the Equality Act.  When he applied for the role of a PSV fitter with Arriva, the recruitment agency refused to forward his application on as he did not hold a PCV licence (or the potential to obtain one once employed).

Mr Maseya alleged that the requirement to hold a PCV licence amounted to a PCP that indirectly discriminated against him as it put him (and others with his disability) at a substantial disadvantage because they were prevented from applying for the role.  He subsequently brought claims against Arriva for failure to make reasonable adjustments and indirect disability discrimination.

In responding to the claim, Arriva argued that the requirement to hold a PCV licence was an essential part of the role and that Mr Maseya was treated in the same way as other non-disabled people.  However, when asked by the tribunal, it was not able to confirm whether all engineers held a PCV licence and in fact accepted that some did not.  It also transpired that Arriva had failed to disclose a document listing engineers without PCV licenses.

Arriva’s attempt to amend its defence failed and the tribunal struck out its case after finding that it had pursued a “false defence” and failed to comply with its duty to disclose.  Mr Maseya was awarded compensation of just over £11,000 together with costs of £12,000.

Arriva argued that the requirement to hold a PCV licence was an essential part of the role and that Mr Maseya was treated in the same way as other non-disabled people.

The decision was set aside on appeal and the case was sent back to be heard by a fresh tribunal.  The EAT held that the tribunal’s conclusion that a fair trial was no longer possible was based on the fundamental misunderstanding of the case.  It also found that there was no basis for a conclusion that there had been a deliberate non-disclosure of relevant documents and there was no reason why disclosure could not be dealt with at the hearing.  The case reinforces the high threshold that should be applied when considering strike out  and that tribunals need to assess whether any lesser, more proportionate sanction, is appropriate.

For factsheets, letters, checklists and policies on discrimination, please visit

For further information on how our employment lawyers can support you when considering strike out, please contact  


About this article


This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

  • 22 September 2023
  • Employment

Talking Employment Law: New family friendly rights

In this first podcast in the ‘Talking Employment Law’ series, Lucy Densham Brown and Rebecca Dowle, members of the employment team summarise some of the big new family-friendly Bills that are working their way through parliament.

  • 20 September 2023
  • Commercial Real Estate

Commercial buyers beware of residential Stamp Duty Land Tax

This article discusses a recent case in which a property buyer calculated the Stamp Duty Land Tax due on the purchase at a lower rate, due to the mixed-use purpose of the property.

  • 19 September 2023
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Organisations’ use of social media: Data protection

Social media applications (or commonly known as ‘apps’) are being developed all the time and we are constantly being introduced to new social media platforms, some of which take almost no time to gain huge popularity.

  • 14 September 2023
  • Immigration

Entrepreneurial Dreams: What is the Innovator Founder Visa?

In an era defined by innovation and entrepreneurship, the United Kingdom has made a substantial effort towards fostering its reputation as a global hub for start-ups and innovators. The introduction of the UK’s ‘Innovator Founder’ route has marked a pivotal moment in the country’s immigration policy.

  • 11 September 2023
  • Corporate and M&A

Changes to the tax treatment of Employee Ownership Trusts

The government published a consultation on 18 July 2023 seeking the public’s views on its proposals to reform the tax treatment of Employee Ownership Trusts and Employee Benefit Trusts. Parties are invited to express their opinions via email via the government website until the consultation closes on 25 September 2023.

  • 08 September 2023
  • Immigration

Navigating the Latest Immigration Rules for Overstayers in the UK: A Comprehensive Guide for 2023

Staying beyond the expiration of your UK visa is a serious matter that, in most cases, can result in significant and long-lasting repercussions.