Search

How can we help?

Icon

Sleep-in workers not entitled to national minimum wage when sleeping

In the recent case of Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake & others, the Supreme Court had to decide how sleep in workers’ working time should be calculated for the National Minimum Wage (NMW).

The claimants in this case were highly skilled carers whose role included sleep-in shifts. During the sleep in shifts they would rarely have to do work, they were able to sleep and were only there as a precaution. One claimant had to intervene 6 times in 16 months.

Under regulation 32 of the National Minimum Wage Regulations (NMWR) 2015, working time will include time where an employee is ‘available’ for work. However, ‘available’ only includes the hours when the worker is awake for the purposes of working. This is even if the worker is sleeping at or near her place of work.

One of the carers was paid £29.05 for a nine-hour sleep-in shift, which equates to £3.22 an hour. The hourly NMW rate for persons aged 18 or over has been £4.98 or above since 2012. The carers brought an employment tribunal case for failure to pay NMW., claiming that all the time spent sleeping should be counted as ‘working time’ for NMW purposes. Her employer’s argument was that when she was sleeping, she wasn’t working, but merely available for work and NMW didn’t apply under regulation 32 of NMWR 2015. They argued that NMW should only apply when she is awake.

The employment tribunal held that the sleep-in exception did not apply as the worker was actually working for the whole period. This is because she had to keep a listening ear while asleep and exercise judgment on whether to intervene. The employer appealed and the Employment Appeal Tribunal agreed with the employment tribunal’s decision.

The employer appealed to the Court of Appeal and they decided that the sleep-in exception applied. They held that any sleep-in worker would have to have a listening ear as that is what they are there for. The worker rarely intervened and would almost always get an interrupted night’s sleep. Therefore, a flat rate was fair.

The employees appealed to the Supreme Court, who unanimously agreed with the Court of Appeal. They held sleep-in workers are not entitled to entitled to national minimum wage when they are sleeping.

JUDGEMENT

Sleep-in workers are not entitled to entitled to national minimum wage when they are sleeping.

This case provides useful clarification on the law relating to national minimum wage for sleep in workers. However, the Supreme Court in their decision were clear in that whether a sleep-in worker is working will depend on the individual circumstances. Read the full review of the judgment.

For further information on compliance with working time and National Minimum Wage laws, please contact our employment law team.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

Caroline Lendrum

Associate

View profile

+44 118 960 4669

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 10 December 2025
  • Privacy and Data Protection

The 12 Data Protection Mistakes of Christmas

As the festive season approaches, it is not just last-minute shopping and office parties that can catch organisations off guard; data protection slip-ups are just as common.

Pub
  • 04 December 2025
  • Immigration

UK Immigration: What to expect in 2026 for employers

Join our UK immigration specialists, Ruth Karimatsenga and Monica Mastropasqua, as they explore the key updates and how they affect your business in 2026.

Pub
  • 04 December 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

Autumn Budget 2025 Breakdown: Key takeaways for business buyers and sellers

Join Stuart Mullins and Nicky Goringe Larkin as they delve into the key updates from the Chancellor’s announcement, with a focus on what matters most for businesses looking to buy and sell.

art
  • 03 December 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

Why is carrying out a legal Due Diligence investigation necessary during an proposed acquisition?

Merging with or acquiring another company is a high-stakes endeavour. The purpose, process and common areas of investigation during a M&A transaction.

art
  • 02 December 2025
  • Employment

All I Want for Christmas… Is No Tribunal Claims!

Before the festivities begin, it is worth unwrapping the key risks and understanding how employers can protect their staff, their reputation and their sanity, while still delivering a thoroughly enjoyable evening.

art
  • 01 December 2025
  • Immigration

Government consultation on extending settlement requirements: What employers and migrants need to know

This article summarises the key proposals , groups who will and will not be affected by the extending settlement requirements, and the potential impact for employers, workers and families.