Search

How can we help?

Icon

Sleep-in workers not entitled to national minimum wage when sleeping

In the recent case of Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake & others, the Supreme Court had to decide how sleep in workers’ working time should be calculated for the National Minimum Wage (NMW).

The claimants in this case were highly skilled carers whose role included sleep-in shifts. During the sleep in shifts they would rarely have to do work, they were able to sleep and were only there as a precaution. One claimant had to intervene 6 times in 16 months.

Under regulation 32 of the National Minimum Wage Regulations (NMWR) 2015, working time will include time where an employee is ‘available’ for work. However, ‘available’ only includes the hours when the worker is awake for the purposes of working. This is even if the worker is sleeping at or near her place of work.

One of the carers was paid £29.05 for a nine-hour sleep-in shift, which equates to £3.22 an hour. The hourly NMW rate for persons aged 18 or over has been £4.98 or above since 2012. The carers brought an employment tribunal case for failure to pay NMW., claiming that all the time spent sleeping should be counted as ‘working time’ for NMW purposes. Her employer’s argument was that when she was sleeping, she wasn’t working, but merely available for work and NMW didn’t apply under regulation 32 of NMWR 2015. They argued that NMW should only apply when she is awake.

The employment tribunal held that the sleep-in exception did not apply as the worker was actually working for the whole period. This is because she had to keep a listening ear while asleep and exercise judgment on whether to intervene. The employer appealed and the Employment Appeal Tribunal agreed with the employment tribunal’s decision.

The employer appealed to the Court of Appeal and they decided that the sleep-in exception applied. They held that any sleep-in worker would have to have a listening ear as that is what they are there for. The worker rarely intervened and would almost always get an interrupted night’s sleep. Therefore, a flat rate was fair.

The employees appealed to the Supreme Court, who unanimously agreed with the Court of Appeal. They held sleep-in workers are not entitled to entitled to national minimum wage when they are sleeping.

JUDGEMENT

Sleep-in workers are not entitled to entitled to national minimum wage when they are sleeping.

This case provides useful clarification on the law relating to national minimum wage for sleep in workers. However, the Supreme Court in their decision were clear in that whether a sleep-in worker is working will depend on the individual circumstances. Read the full review of the judgment.

For further information on compliance with working time and National Minimum Wage laws, please contact our employment law team.

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

Caroline Lendrum

Associate

View profile

+44 118 960 4669

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 09 April 2026
  • Employment

Bereaved Partner’s Paternity Leave: the new statutory right explained

art
  • 02 April 2026
  • Commercial Real Estate

Can I have access to a neighbour’s land to carry out works to my property?

As a landowner, maintaining and repairing your property is important. It may be the case that to do so, you will need to access the land of a neighbour.

art
  • 01 April 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Recognising DSARs: top tips for organisations

The UK GDPR grants Data Subjects, who are the individuals to whom the personal data relates, rights over their personal data, including the rights of access, correction and erasure.

art
  • 30 March 2026
  • Employment

Legislative Changes – What Employers Need to Know for April 2026

With the phased implementation of the Employment Rights Act 2025 (ERA), alongside other legislative updates, April 2026 brings a wide range of important changes for employers.

Pub
  • 27 March 2026
  • Corporate and M&A

Shareholder Disputes: What to do when disputes arise – Episode 4

Join Stuart Mullins and Jack Hobbs for episode four of our Shareholder Disputes podcast series as they confront the realities of shareholder fallouts and share practical strategies for managing these complex situations.

art
  • 24 March 2026
  • Immigration

Spouse Visa – Is your relationship genuine and subsisting?

For years many couples have become frustrated by the requirements for a spouse visa as the rules and guidance are difficult to understand. A significant amount of applications are rejected on the basis of the applicant not providing the adequate documents to evidence the relationship requirement.