Search

How can we help?

Icon

Sexual harassment in the workplace

In the current age of the #MeToo movement, one would assume that any form of unwanted physical contact between a manager and a junior employee could count as harassment.

In Raj v Capita Business Services Limited, a male employee had brought tribunal claims that his female manager committed an act of sexual harassment or harassment related to sex when she “briefly massaged” his shoulders in an open plan office. The ET decided that this did not amount to sexual harassment (as it was not considered to be conduct of a sexual nature) or harassment related to sex (as there was limited evidence to show that the conduct related to the Claimant’s gender). The Claimant challenged the latter finding and the appeal tribunal has now upheld the original decision that the conduct did not amount to harassment relating to sex.

Whilst it was considered that the conduct was “unwise and uncomfortable” and that it was indeed unwanted, it was held to be a “one-off incident”, relating to a “gender-neutral body part”.  There was no evidence that the manager had acted in this way to other employees, male or female. Rather than conduct related to sex, it was found to be a misguided attempt at encouragement of an underperforming employee and therefore non-discriminatory.

A male employee had brought tribunal claims that his female manager committed an act of sexual harassment or harassment related to sex when she “briefly massaged” his shoulders in an open plan office.

Along with other recent decisions, this shows that harassment claims are both fact and conduct sensitive: to succeed, claimants have to satisfy every aspect of the legal test.

More importantly, it highlights the need for employers to have clear policies and training on anti-harassment and conduct in the workplace in order to avoid claims of this nature. For assistance with this, contact our employment team.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 10 October 2024
  • Employment

Employment Rights Bill – the biggest changes for a generation

Today, 10 October 2024, the Government has unveiled their long-awaited Employment Rights Bill, fulfilling their election manifesto pledge to introduce major reform to workers’ rights within 100 days of government.

art
  • 10 October 2024
  • Employment

Prioritise mental health in the workplace – FAQs

Today is World Mental Health Day, and the focus this year is mental health at work.

art
  • 08 October 2024
  • Immigration

The Immigration Rules updates – October 2024

The Home Office has issued a statement of changes to the Immigration Rules, impacting UK immigration applications. Published on 10 September 2024, these changes take effect as of yesterday, 08 October 2024, with some set to be implemented in early 2025.

art
  • 08 October 2024
  • Employment

Hidden Disabilities in the Workplace: Chronic Pain

In this article we will consider guidance on how hidden disabilities can be managed in the workplace and what employers should consider specifically for employees suffering from chronic pain.

Pub
  • 08 October 2024
  • Public Procurement

Procurement Challenges under the Procurement Act 2023

Taking prompt advice is essential as unsuccessful bidders have just ten days within which to issue court proceedings if they want to benefit from the automatic suspension provided for in the Regulations, which prevents the contracting authority from awarding the contract to anyone else.

art
  • 03 October 2024

Clarkslegal receives outstanding results in Legal 500 guide

Clarkslegal thanks clients for exceptional feedback in its 2025 Legal 500 rankings. Clarkslegal is proud that Legal 500 has recognised the firm in the following areas: Construction, Litigation, Property, Corporate, Employment & Immigration.