Search

How can we help?

Icon

Raising finance: How not to break the rules on financial promotions

Financial promotions are a complex area and is defined in Section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA) as being ‘an invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity, communicated by a person in the course of business.’ It applies to all forms of communication written or spoken, including whether they are made via social media or in print. 

Similarly, ‘in the ordinary course of business’ is intended to cover a wide range of scenarios, including, where a company is already in operation, it will be acting in the ordinary course of business if it seeks to raise additional share or loan capital. 

The FSMA states that anyone who is not an authorised person (regulated by a specific governing financial body) cannot during business, communicate an invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity unless the promotion has been made or approved by an authorised person, and/or it is exempt. 

This does not just apply to financial institutions but also to owner managed companies, or startups looking to attract funding.  

July 2020 saw consultation on a new regulatory framework. Responses were received and the Treasury published its formal response in July of this year.   We wait to see if there will be a simplified or new framework, but currently, the rules to consider remain those contained in FSMA. 

When seeking to ensure the communication complies with the section 21 restriction, the difficulty in ensuring most often arises in determining whether the communication is an inducement or invitation. The guidance suggests that the following be considered: 

  • The intention of the communicator issuing the communication was to persuade the recipient to engage in an investment activity? Or  
  • Regard the communication as seeking to persuade the recipient to engage in an investment activity?
Jacob Montague

Senior Solicitor

View profile

+44 118 960 4613

The FSMA states that anyone who is not an authorised person cannot during business, communicate an invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity unless the promotion has been made or approved by an authorised person, and/or it is exempt. 

The communicator needs to be confident that the communication is purely factual; for example acknowledging the existence of the investment opportunities and avoid any promotional element. It is unadvisable to offer advertisements, prospectuses with application forms, or promotions that try to actively initiate an investment activity; and/or directly invite a person to take steps that will result in their engagement in an investment activity. 

The financial restriction will not apply where the promotion has been approved by an authorised person/institution. In its consultation last year, HM Treasury publicised its concerns that authorised firms were approving promotions outside of their expertise and not conducting significant due diligence on the communicator. The consultation proposed several options that it hoped would impose higher obligations on authorised firms and therefore mitigate the risk of insufficiently vetted financial promotions.  

The restriction is a complicated area of legislation. Specific professional advice should be sort before making any communication that could fall under the financial promotion restriction given its broad application.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Jacob Montague

Senior Solicitor

View profile

+44 118 960 4613

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 19 May 2025
  • Corporate and M&A

Thinking of exiting your business? Part 2

In the second instalment of our three-part series, join Stuart Mullins from Clarkslegal and Nicky Goringe Larkin from Succession Planning as they discuss the complexities surrounding business financing, accounting practices, and valuation strategies, along with key insights into private equity.

Pub
  • 16 May 2025
  • Employment

London Seminar – Understanding the Employment Rights Bill: Legal changes and what they mean for HR

We are pleased to invite you to an in-person seminar at our London office on Tuesday 24th June, hosted by our Employment Law team. Join Monica Atwal, Managing Partner; Katie Glendinning, Partner; and Amanda Glover, Associate, as they unpack the legal implications of the new Employment Rights Bill and what it means for your organisation.

Pub
  • 16 May 2025
  • Employment

Reading Seminar – Understanding the Employment Rights Bill: Legal changes and what they mean for HR

We are pleased to invite you to an in-person seminar at our Reading office Tuesday 17th June hosted by our Employment Law team. Join Monica Atwal, Managing Partner, Katie Glendinning, Partner and Amanda Glover, Associate, will unpack the legal implications of the new Employment Rights Bill and what it means for your organisation.

art
  • 15 May 2025
  • Immigration

The 2025 Immigration White Paper: A Turning Point in UK Immigration Policy

On 12 May 2025, the UK Government unveiled its White Paper titled “Restoring Control Over the Immigration System”, outlining the most substantial proposed changes to immigration law since the post-Brexit overhaul.

Pub
  • 15 May 2025
  • Employment

TUPE Podcast Series – Information and Consultation Obligations

In this ninth episode of our TUPE Podcast Series, Katie Glendinning, a Partner in the employment team, will examine the information and consultation obligations under TUPE.

art
  • 15 May 2025
  • Privacy and Data Protection

Ashley v HMRC – The High Court clarifies the scope of Data Subject Access Requests

DSARs are very rarely the subject of litigation, and they are even rarer in the High Court, so the case of Ashley v HMRC is a valuable decision for both data subjects and data controllers.