Search

How can we help?

Icon

Revised Procedure for Debt Claims against Individuals

In April the Ministry of Justice released a new Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims which revises the procedure claimants have to follow before suing an individual for an unpaid debt.  While it contains potentially helpful standardisation of pre-action documents, it also introduces time-frame adjustments which could help defendants to delay litigation for over three months.  We think it crucial that organisations review their debt recovery systems and practices, to ensure these changes don’t increase the cash-flow impact of unpaid debts.

The new protocol, which will come into force on 1 October 2017, will lead to very significant changes for most creditor businesses including public bodies.  Although the new procedure only applies to claims against individuals, that will of course catch many sole traders.  It sets out very specific requirements for the information in a creditor’s Letter of Claim, including an additional 10 pages of standard forms, although thankfully these are for the debtor to complete!  Aside from this, the protocol precludes Court proceedings from being started in the following situations:

  • During the first 30 days after the Letter of Claim.
  • If a debtor then sends a reply or request documents, a further 30 days.
  • If a debtor says they are seeking debt advice taking longer than 30 days, a “reasonable” amount of time should be allowed.
  • Once the debtor has responded to the Letter of Claim but agreement not reached, a further 14 days’ after the creditor gives notice of the intention to proceed.

It is easy to foresee a cynical debtor delaying proceedings for two months without having any legitimate defence, or longer if any document is omitted from the letter of claim.  This begs the question, what are the consequences if a creditor issues proceedings without having complied?  The Court has a several options to sanction the creditor:

  • Order the case be stayed to allow the parties to further correspond and negotiate.
  • Make the procedure for handling the case more favourable to the debtor.
  • Order the creditor to pay all or part of the legal costs incurred by the debtor, even if the creditor wins the case
  • Deprive the creditor of part or all of any interest they may be entitled to.

It is crucial that organisations review their debt recovery systems and practices, to ensure these changes don’t increase the cash-flow impact of unpaid debts.

Of course in practice it is difficult to see a Court penalising a creditor by imposing these sanctions if it appears the debtor has behaved unreasonably, but it creates unwelcome uncertainty and delay for a creditor seeking to recover even an undisputed debt.

It is recommended that all organisations revise their debt recovery procedures to ensure they are protocol compliant, and consider whether there is a need to involve solicitors at an earlier stage to ensure timely enforcement of debts.  One procedural option to limit delay might be to send a standard form Letter of Claim as soon as, or shortly after, a debt becomes due, but this letter will need to comply fully with the protocol, and will require someone actively checking that all requirements have been met.  Such a letter does not need to be aggressive but will need to at least mention that Court action is being contemplated and ask for a reply.

About this article

Disclaimer
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 01 June 2023
  • Employment

Facts employees should know about their personal data

We previously published an article on facts an employer should know about holding personal data, so it is only fair that we also write about the other side of the coin – facts employees should know as individuals whose personal data is held by their employer.

art
  • 01 June 2023
  • Immigration

What is the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) and how much do you have to pay?

The Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) is a levy on companies who sponsor migrant workers. This levy was imposed on 6 April 2017. The Government states that the charge has been levied to contribute towards addressing the skills gap in the local economy.

art
  • 26 May 2023
  • Employment

Avoiding discrimination in flexible working requests

The right to request flexible working is currently available to employees with at least 26 weeks’ service and is set to be extended further under new Government reforms.

art
  • 25 May 2023
  • Corporate and M&A

Management Buyout – Top 5 things to consider

A management buyout is a financial transaction in which a member of the management team purchases the company from its registered owner. MBO’s usually occur in private companies in an effort to enhance profitability and simplify strategies.

art
  • 25 May 2023
  • Employment

Carer’s Leave Bill set to become law

On 19 May 2023, the Carer’s Leave Bill had its third reading in the House of Lords, and upon receiving Royal Assent, will become law. There is not yet a date for the implementation of this bill, however it is likely that this will happen relatively quickly upon receiving Royal Assent, so is definitely one to keep an eye on.

art
  • 18 May 2023
  • Immigration

Navigating SOC Codes

When it comes to UK immigration, understanding the intricacies of the system is vital. One significant aspect of the process revolves around Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) codes. SOC codes play a crucial role in determining the eligibility for an individual to apply for a work visa, assessing skill levels, and matching individuals to appropriate job roles.